Search for: "Doe 103"
Results 2381 - 2400
of 3,234
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Mar 2013, 2:29 am
§103 A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. [read post]
9 Jun 2008, 7:42 pm
Rep. 103-112 at 286-87. [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 12:26 am
In total this averages out at approximately 103 days or 3,4 months from the date your offer is accepted to the date of transfer. [read post]
3 Sep 2010, 1:11 pm
So how does this potentially affect investors? [read post]
14 Apr 2011, 6:34 am
However, this does not render the claimed invention non-obvious. [read post]
3 Jun 2011, 5:34 am
However, the decision of the Supreme Court does mean that there may be an element of uncertainty as to the ambit of an appeal to the tax tribunals. [read post]
17 Sep 2013, 6:45 pm
In some cases the Board found that a §102 ground of unpatentability may be redundant with a §103 which relies on a different primary reference where the Petitioner does not “articulate any meaningful distinction between those separate disclosures in terms of potential strengths and weaknesses in the application of each disclosure to those claim limitations. [read post]
9 Aug 2010, 4:00 am
Does anybody keep those old parts? [read post]
21 Jan 2016, 2:27 pm
§§ 102 and 103. [read post]
11 Nov 2008, 11:50 am
Place, 462 U.S. 696, 103 S. [read post]
26 Oct 2010, 11:35 am
Stat. 6-8-103 (2007). [read post]
5 Dec 2021, 8:52 pm
Evid. 103(a)(2). [read post]
7 Jul 2011, 7:21 am
—For purposes of this section, the term “covered business method patent” means a patent that claims a method or corresponding apparatus for performing data processing or other operations used in the practice, administration, or management of a financial product or service, except that the term does not include patents for technological inventions. (2) REGULATIONS. [read post]
18 Nov 2011, 1:49 pm
It asserted that Proposition 103 requires the CDI to share that authority with consumer representatives. 4. [read post]
8 Jan 2009, 10:09 am
At para. 118 he states, "In my view, the parties cannot avoid the proper application of the Act by conceding or asserting that the relevant provision [subsection 74.5(11)] does not apply. [read post]
11 Sep 2010, 1:40 pm
Preventive Controls Requirements: (Sec. 103) Requires each owner, operator, or agent in charge of a food facility to: (1) evaluate the hazards that could affect food; (2) identify and implement preventive controls; (3) monitor the performance of those controls; and (4) maintain records of such monitoring. [read post]
21 Jan 2009, 4:04 am
Professor Rubinstein's law review article, A Lawyers Worst Nightmare: The Story Of A Lawyer And His Nurse Clients Who Were Both Criminally Charged Because The Nurses Resigned En Mass, [103 Northwestern U. [read post]
26 Jun 2017, 2:00 am
§ 103 and this Court’s precedent in KSR Int’l Co. v. [read post]
23 May 2012, 11:45 am
., 189 F. 95, 103 (C.C.S.D.N.Y. 1911) Briefs in the AMP v. [read post]
1 Mar 2010, 1:38 pm
There is, moreover, no basis for interpreting the Security Council’s powers in relation to the determination of the existence of acts of aggression as either pre-emptive or plenary under Articles 39 and 103 of the UN Charter: Other provisions of the Charter, particularly Articles 36(3), 37, 38 and 40 indicate that the Security Council does not have the ability to make decisions that have the function of allocating responsibility, or that are an integral part of a judicial… [read post]
