Search for: "Does 1-39"
Results 2381 - 2400
of 5,128
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Jan 2015, 11:00 am
Har-Con Corp., 39 S.W.3d 191 (Tex. 2001), the Court explained that “[i]f the trial court’s intent to enter a final judgment is ‘clear from the order, then the order is final and appealable, even though the record does not provide an adequate basis for rendition of judgment. [read post]
30 Jan 2015, 7:26 am
If this Act does not receive the vote necessary for immediate effect, this Act takes effect September 1, 2015.The most heavily-criticized part of the law is Section 38A.003 which permits deadly force for the defense of school property. [read post]
28 Jan 2015, 1:15 pm
Des Moines: Opening the Schoolhouse Gates to First Amendment Freedom, 39 J. [read post]
27 Jan 2015, 4:15 pm
Adding her as a Part 20 Defendant certainly does make for a far more interesting trial. [read post]
26 Jan 2015, 10:10 pm
Complete text of bill is below, but here are the bullet points:Conditions covered - Cancer, AIDS or Parkinson's DiseasePhysician certifies its use.Potency "the specific concentrations of individual cannabinoids that must be present to treat the patient's condition," Limited to a 30-day supply.Dispensaries approved by county commissionFlorida Medical Marijuana - Complete Text of Proposed 2015 LawFlorida Senate - 2015 SB 528By Senator… [read post]
22 Jan 2015, 9:56 pm
Tr. of Oral Arg. 39. [read post]
22 Jan 2015, 1:47 pm
¶¶ 38-39 (Teva v. [read post]
22 Jan 2015, 4:35 am
This is because, "unlike Article 15(1)(c) of [the Brussels I] Regulation No 44/2001 ... [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 3:41 am
The meaning of “treatment” Although s 1 of the Act does not use the word “treatment”, it is clear that the treatment to which s 4 refers is the termination of pregnancy under s 1. [read post]
19 Jan 2015, 3:52 am
Here are the top 5 questions that I have been fielding: 1. [read post]
18 Jan 2015, 7:48 pm
Article 39 of the Constitution makes no express reference to the Preamble to the Constitution. [read post]
16 Jan 2015, 11:44 am
Phares, 39 S.W.3d 708, 713 (Tex. [read post]
15 Jan 2015, 3:09 am
" [para 39]Why not booking your Fez hotel through Booking.com ? [read post]
14 Jan 2015, 10:05 am
Does a survey ever help? [read post]
14 Jan 2015, 4:00 am
Does this court have jurisdiction to quash the letters? [read post]
13 Jan 2015, 12:16 pm
Reed (In re Angelle), 610 F.2d 1335, 1338-39 (5th Cir.1980). [read post]
11 Jan 2015, 7:52 pm
Donnino, Practice Commentary, McKinney’s Cons Laws of NY, Book 39, Penal Law 121.11, 2014 Pocket Part at 41-42). [read post]
6 Jan 2015, 11:46 am
In response to the protest, Glucan informed the SBA Area Office that its ownership structure was as follows: (1) 48% was owned by Focus First, a limited partnership; (2) 13% was owned by the Wisconsin Alumni Research Foundation, a non-profit; and (3) the remaining 39% interest was held by four individuals. [read post]
6 Jan 2015, 10:44 am
[1] [2009] UKHL 39, [2009] 1 A.C. 1391 [2] [1896] 2 Ch. 743 [3] [1993] Ch. 223 [4] [1979] Ch. 250 [read post]
5 Jan 2015, 8:19 pm
Such immunity does not last long, though. [read post]
