Search for: "Harris v. State" Results 2381 - 2400 of 5,096
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Jun 2009, 5:04 pm
  The majority concluded, following a decision by the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, Luckey v. [read post]
2 Jul 2014, 5:05 am
The Commonwealth further stated that its protocol would not violate [Gelfgatt’s] rights under . . . the 5h Amendment to the United States Constitution. . . . [read post]
11 Apr 2019, 3:58 am by Edith Roberts
Carlton & Harris Chiropractic Inc. and Kisor v. [read post]
21 Feb 2025, 6:29 am
Musk II for Executive Compensation and for Stockholder Ratification Posted by Gail Weinstein, Philip Richter, and Steven Epstein, Fried, Frank, Harris, Shriver & Jacobson LLP, on Saturday, February 15, 2025 Tags: Delaware Court of Chancery, Elon Musk, Executive Compensation, stockholders The Industry Veteran CEO: Friend or Foe? [read post]
21 Feb 2025, 6:29 am
Musk II for Executive Compensation and for Stockholder Ratification Posted by Gail Weinstein, Philip Richter, and Steven Epstein, Fried, Frank, Harris, Shriver & Jacobson LLP, on Saturday, February 15, 2025 Tags: Delaware Court of Chancery, Elon Musk, Executive Compensation, stockholders The Industry Veteran CEO: Friend or Foe? [read post]
23 Jul 2010, 4:16 pm by Colin O'Keefe
- Minneapolis lawyer Dan Kelly of Winthrop & Weinstine on the firm's Duets Blog Ten Reasons Chinese Companies Fail In The United States. - Seattle attorney Dan Harris of Harris & Moure on the firm's China Law Blog [read post]
1 Jul 2019, 2:56 am by Walter Olson
Davenport Civil Rights Commission] Second Circuit withdraws decision that held landlords liable for tenant-on-tenant harassment under Fair Housing Act [Scott Greenfield, earlier] Tags: discrimination law, harassment law, housing discrimination, Kamala Harris, New York state, Supreme Court, Texas [read post]
6 Oct 2024, 4:03 pm by INFORRM
Fancourt J criticised Prince Harry’s individual claim in the phone hacking litigation against News Group Newspapers, stating that “the claim at times resembles more an entrenched front in a campaign between two obdurate but well-resourced armies than a claim for misuse of private information” and is “starting to absorb more than an appropriate share of the court’s resources” [9]. [read post]
24 Jan 2024, 11:18 pm by Steven Calabresi
 And, no matter how the Court rules in Trump v. [read post]