Search for: "LAWS v. DAVIS" Results 2381 - 2400 of 6,272
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Aug 2016, 6:27 am
Loseman, Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP, on Saturday, July 30, 2016 Tags: Class actions, Delaware cases, Delaware law, Disclosure, Fraud-on-the-Market, Halliburton, Merger litigation,Omnicare v. [read post]
5 Aug 2016, 5:40 am by SHG
It is well-settled law that legislative enactments carry a strong presumption of constitutionality (People v Stuart, 100 NY2d 412, 422 [2003); People v Scott, 26 NY2d 286, 291 [1970)) Thus, a party seeking to find a statute unconstitutional bears a heavy burden and “must demonstrate, ‘beyond a reasonable doubt’, that the statute suffers from ‘wholesale constitutional impairment'” (People v Davis, 13… [read post]
31 Jul 2016, 12:00 am by Smita Ghosh
In the London Review of Books, but behind a paywall, are a review of Entick v. [read post]
30 Jul 2016, 7:50 pm by The Blog Team
Hormel, Hormel Law Office, LLC, Spokane, WA)   United States v. [read post]
28 Jul 2016, 3:11 pm by Harold O'Grady
Another type of impeachment discussed in the book is motivation or bias impeachment the constitutional dimension of which was firmly recognized in Davis v. [read post]
22 Jul 2016, 4:04 am by INFORRM
The approach of the Court in Ireland v Parliament and Council (Case C-301/06), which was a challenge to the Data Retention Directive as regards the Treaty provision on which it was enacted, meant that general data retention obligations ‘do not fall within the sphere of criminal law’ (para 95). [read post]
18 Jul 2016, 6:08 am by Robert L. Abell
Nevertheless, Judge Davis concurred based on the court’s prior decision in United States v. [read post]
17 Jul 2016, 4:08 pm by INFORRM
Last week in the Courts On 14 July 2016, Nicola Davies J ordered the hearing of a preliminary issue in the case of Baxmann v Etok. [read post]
14 Jul 2016, 10:30 am by W.F. Casey Ebsary, Jr.
Williams-Davis, No. 2:14-cr-04072-SRB-1, 2015 WL 6942499 (W.D. [read post]
6 Jul 2016, 4:05 am by Howard Friedman
Davis, (ED KY, filed 7/1/2016)) alleges in part:The Plaintiff seek one of two forms of relief: (1) that the state be enjoined from enforcing any laws and policies that prevents him from legally marrying an inanimate object in light of the decision in Obergefell v. [read post]