Search for: "MATTER OF D S N"
Results 2381 - 2400
of 5,778
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Nov 2011, 9:35 am
Remis’s attorney on the matter, Frederick R. [read post]
5 Aug 2022, 5:01 am
"[13] Nonetheless, it seems to me that there's a strong argument—as a First Amendment matter but even more so as a policy matter—in favor of some such limits on the political speech protection laws, when it comes to employees who speak on the employer's behalf to the public or to clients. [read post]
18 May 2024, 11:49 am
Pix credit hereFor those who may have missed this, οn 8 May 2024, National Human Rights Institutions (NHRIs) from all regions gathered in Geneva for the Annual Conference of the Global Alliance of National Human Rights Institutions (GANHRI), on the role and experiences of NHRIs in addressing Business and Human Rights (BHR), at which they adopted the GANHRI Statement (8 May 2024): Business and Human Rights: The Role and Experiences of NHRI's. [read post]
13 May 2011, 6:07 pm
Sure, we’d seen the blurbs about it from BNA and other sources, but Rhodes is an environmental contamination (alleged) case, so we’d let it go by. [read post]
8 Apr 2014, 5:24 am
§ 45(n), “the FTC’s many public complaints and consent agreements, as well as its public statements and business guidance brochure,” and Wyndham’s own references to “industry standard practices” and “commercially reasonable efforts” regarding data security in its publicly posted privacy policy. [read post]
30 May 2024, 12:35 pm
The commission responded that "it d[id] not regulate or suppress obscenity but simply exhort[ed] booksellers and advise[d] them of their legal rights. [read post]
8 Dec 2009, 7:53 pm
If I'd just been more forceful in his defense, none of this would have happened. [read post]
23 Jul 2018, 5:51 am
After all, Illinois is not forcing its employees to say anything about AFSCME, about the subject matter or bona fides of the union's negotiations, or about anything else--let alone to attest to a belief in something they don't believe (nor even to display unwanted government speech as they move throughout the day, as in Wooley v. [read post]
8 Dec 2015, 6:57 am
” d. [read post]
4 Oct 2022, 6:20 pm
D the courts have the capacity (or the authority) to parse these offerings? [read post]
23 Aug 2016, 2:30 pm
” Similarly, Section 97.101(d) of the FCC’s Rules states that “[n]o amateur operator shall willfully or maliciously interfere with or cause interference to any radio communication or signal. [read post]
23 Aug 2016, 2:30 pm
” Similarly, Section 97.101(d) of the FCC’s Rules states that “[n]o amateur operator shall willfully or maliciously interfere with or cause interference to any radio communication or signal. [read post]
6 Jan 2023, 4:36 am
Michael D. [read post]
29 May 2016, 9:38 am
The Heart of the Matter The classic early cases in products liability law were about consumers hurt by consumer products, sold by manufacturers or dealers directly to consumers. [read post]
31 Mar 2020, 6:46 pm
While we prepared his case, the AAO set the new standards for NIW cases in Matter of Dhanasar, 26 I&N Dec. 884 (AAO 2016). [read post]
22 Jan 2014, 4:13 pm
But it seems to me that this assumes the conclusion, at least if the judge is suggesting that “Wandering Dagos” ought to be socially condemned (a separate matter, as the judge realizes, from whether it’s protected by the First Amendment). [read post]
5 Apr 2012, 11:54 am
But beyond that everything is fair game.Where there’s been a pro-defense preemption decision of any sort, no matter what the product, the first response we always see from the other side (other than to run to the politicians to try to change the law) is concealment. [read post]
6 Jun 2022, 6:30 am
Berman and Richard D. [read post]
24 May 2019, 7:16 am
R. 54(D). [read post]
4 Sep 2012, 10:00 am
PNS STORES, INC., D/B/A MACFRUGAL'S BARGAIN CLOSEOUTS D/B/A MACFRUGALS, INC. v. [read post]
