Search for: "Mays v. State"
Results 2381 - 2400
of 119,862
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Feb 2016, 5:46 am
But there’s one interesting one raised by Albert Gidari that may cut through a lot of the “bigger” questions (especially the Constitutional ones that everyone leaps to) and just makes a pretty simple point: the DOJ is simply wrong that the All Writs Act applies here, rather than the existing wiretapping statute, the Communications Assistance for Law Enforcement Act, or 47 USC 1002, better known by basically everyone as CALEA. [read post]
23 Jul 2019, 10:31 am
The Supreme Court recently issued its long-awaited ruling in Knick v. [read post]
23 Jun 2023, 12:34 pm
In Smith v. [read post]
Alasaad v. McAleenan: Suspicionless Smartphone Searches at the Border are Unconstitutional, For Now.
8 Mar 2020, 5:08 pm
This is shown in United States v. [read post]
2 Jan 2014, 6:22 am
In Baanyan Software Services Inc. v. [read post]
18 Nov 2011, 3:30 am
Williams v. [read post]
11 Apr 2022, 1:07 pm
Karl v. [read post]
11 Jan 2023, 3:03 am
An attorney discharged without cause may seek recovery in quantum meruit for the reasonable value of his or her services (Butler, Fitzgerald & Potter v Gelmin, 235 AD2d 218,219 [1st Dept 1997]). [read post]
5 May 2009, 11:34 am
May 5, 2009) [read post]
25 Jul 2008, 9:48 pm
United States v. [read post]
7 Jun 2024, 7:00 am
AFGHAN AND IRAQI ALLIES, UNDER SERIOUS THREAT BECAUSE OF THEIR FAITHFUL SERVICE TO THE UNITED STATES, ON THEIR OWN AND ON BEHALF OF OTHERS SIMILARLY SITUATED v. [read post]
24 Jan 2007, 9:13 pm
Kahle v. [read post]
3 May 2020, 4:16 pm
As already mentioned, on 1 May 2020, Warby J handed down judgment in the Duchess of Sussex v Associated Newspapers [2020] EWHC 1058 (Ch). [read post]
1 Jun 2009, 2:00 am
McConkey and another (Appellants) v The Simon Community (Respondents) (Northern Ireland) [2009] UKHL 24 (20 May 2009) Odelola (FC) (Appellant) v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Respondent) [2009] UKHL 25 (20 May 2009) R (on the application of G) (FC) (Appellant) v London Borough of Southwark (Respondents) [2009] UKHL 26 (20 May 2009) Smith (Appellant) v [...] [read post]
15 May 2024, 5:59 am
May in Indy! [read post]
27 May 2011, 9:18 am
Nafta Traders, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Jun 2010, 1:27 pm
The United States Supreme Court has just issued an immigration related decision that breaths a whisper of common sense back into the interpretation of our United States immigration laws.In Carachuri-Rosendo v. [read post]
2 Nov 2010, 5:43 pm
[Post by Venkat] State v. [read post]
31 May 2023, 11:18 am
” Sackett v. [read post]
31 May 2023, 11:18 am
” Sackett v. [read post]
