Search for: "Michigan v. United States"
Results 2381 - 2400
of 3,728
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Dec 2011, 12:01 am
See Zamsky v. [read post]
20 Dec 2011, 4:13 pm
, Election Law Journal (forthcoming 2011) (draft available) Citizens United and the Orphaned Antidistortion Rationale, 27 Georgia State Law Review 989 (2011) (symposium on Citizens United) The Nine Lives of Buckley v. [read post]
20 Dec 2011, 10:26 am
The Michigan study was informed by the Baldus study, a famous study that was used as evidence in McClesky v. [read post]
18 Dec 2011, 6:56 pm
See Shelly v. [read post]
16 Dec 2011, 7:05 pm
Cal., filed December 14, 2011).Neal Fortin is the author of Food Regulation: Law, Science, Policy, and Practice, and he is Professor and Director of the Michigan State University Institute for Food Laws and Regulations, where he teaches online courses in Food Regulation in the United States, International Food Law, and Codex Alimentarius. [read post]
16 Dec 2011, 12:53 pm
Secretary of United States Army, No. 10-1172 (Dec. 14, 2011). [read post]
16 Dec 2011, 6:30 am
Whether a particular property has “wetlands” as defined by the Federal Wetland Delineation Manual and whether the wetlands constitute “waters of the United States” is not a matter easily discernable by anybody. [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 8:24 pm
Smith, Michigan State University; Charles K. [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 5:07 pm
The verb “abridge” is used as a synonym for discrimination in exactly this way in the Fifteenth Amendment which says “The right of citizens of the United States to vote shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any State on account of race, color, or previous condition of servitude. [read post]
14 Dec 2011, 7:53 pm
Interestingly, in justifying why the Supreme Court should review the denial of the injunction, the States assert that this is a common law case of nuisance between several states (Michigan, Minnesota, Ohio, Wisconsin and Pennsylvania) on one hand, and the United States Army Corps of Engineers and "an instrumentality of Illinois" on the other hand. [read post]
14 Dec 2011, 1:30 pm
The order simply states that, "The Solicitor General is invited to file a brief in these cases expressing the views of the United States. [read post]
14 Dec 2011, 1:18 pm
Our mission is to show that originalism leads to Justice Ginsburg’s opinion in United States v. [read post]
14 Dec 2011, 10:59 am
Note that United States v. [read post]
13 Dec 2011, 12:00 pm
United States, and Florida v. [read post]
13 Dec 2011, 7:25 am
United States Army Corps of Engineers, 543 F.3d 586, 594 (9th Cir. 2008)). [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 12:50 pm
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia. [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 8:00 am
Border ControlAmicus brief of Michigan and Ten other States (forthcoming)Amicus brief of Mountain States Legal FoundationAmicus brief of Cochise County Sheriff Larry A. [read post]
9 Dec 2011, 3:42 am
30 Michigan Journal of International Law 1017, 1043-45 (2009). [read post]
6 Dec 2011, 9:02 am
In this post- Citizens United world of ours (Citizens United being possibly the worst U.S. [read post]
5 Dec 2011, 1:28 pm
Appealed from the United States District Court for the District of Montana. [read post]
