Search for: "NEW JERSEY v. UNITED STATES" Results 2381 - 2400 of 3,521
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Jun 2010, 1:32 pm by Erin Miller
New Jersey and culminated – at least in constitutional terms – with another Justice Stevens opinion in United States v. [read post]
15 May 2012, 12:08 pm by Arthur J. Fried
  While New York, in response to PRWORA, actually passed legislation making aliens ineligible for Medicaid, that law was struck down as being violative of the New York State Constitution in Aliessa v. [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 7:27 am by Ken Shigley
First, it has long been the law in most of the United States that baseball spectators assume the risk of being hit by stray balls. [read post]
1 Aug 2019, 8:30 am by Seeger Weiss LLP
This has included a $280 million settlement in United States of America ex rel Ven-A-Care of the Florida Keys, Inc. v. [read post]
6 Aug 2019, 5:45 am by Kevin Kaufman
Overview of Taxes on Tangible Personal Property In the United States, levies on personal property emerged in tandem with taxes on real property. [read post]
24 Mar 2016, 10:43 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
There is a New Jersey connection:In 2013, Depomed sued Purdue in the United StatesDistrict Court for the District of New Jersey, alleginginfringement of the ’475 and ’280 patents. [read post]
7 Mar 2016, 3:11 am by Peter Mahler
Currently, fourteen states plus the District of Columbia have adopted RULLCA including California, Florida, and two of New York’s neighbors — New Jersey and Vermont. [read post]
7 Mar 2016, 3:11 am by Peter Mahler
Currently, fourteen states plus the District of Columbia have adopted RULLCA including California, Florida, and two of New York’s neighbors — New Jersey and Vermont. [read post]
7 Mar 2016, 3:11 am by Peter Mahler
Currently, fourteen states plus the District of Columbia have adopted RULLCA including California, Florida, and two of New York’s neighbors — New Jersey and Vermont. [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 4:31 am by Jeremy Tyler
The court agreed: It is well established that the United States and its agencies are immune from suit unless Congress explicitly waives sovereign immunity. [read post]
11 Jan 2016, 9:07 pm by Stephen Bilkis
The plaintiff takes the position that the law of New Jersey is applicable, and states that, because of the 'unique' nature of the bequest, there are no New York cases in point--and since, indeed, there are no New Jersey [read post]
17 Mar 2008, 7:11 am
New Jersey (2000) and Blakely v. [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 6:27 am by Amanda Rice
United States and United States v. [read post]
30 Apr 2017, 8:10 am by James S. Friedman, LLC
Friedman represents individuals with criminal charges in the Superior Court throughout New Jersey, the United States District Courts located in New Jersey and New York City, and the New York State criminal courts in Manhattan and Brooklyn. [read post]