Search for: "People v. Profit"
Results 2381 - 2400
of 4,430
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Aug 2014, 6:30 am
I read this passage as suggesting that the much-maligned “economic/non-economic” distinction in United States v. [read post]
25 Aug 2014, 9:35 am
Pritchard v. [read post]
22 Aug 2014, 1:34 pm
This provision requires that such exchanges be either state agencies or non-profits established by the state; for-profits and non-state entities need not apply. [read post]
21 Aug 2014, 2:44 pm
That is why the district court was correct and the Sixth Circuit is wrong in Payne v. [read post]
21 Aug 2014, 11:10 am
Thus, the ECJ has required a for-profit enterprise, to interpret its inherently subjective standards—without any knowledge about the underlying facts. [read post]
16 Aug 2014, 5:26 pm
” Judge Gibson awarded the home, a not-for-profit corporation, damages of $50,000. [read post]
15 Aug 2014, 10:00 am
The opinion in Gilliland v. [read post]
15 Aug 2014, 7:43 am
Video games are becoming increasingly realistic and many include real-life people. [read post]
15 Aug 2014, 12:17 am
If seven out of ten landlords are amateurs that worries me in my professional capacity because most of you that I meet are nice people heading fro a slow motion car crash because your eyes are on the profit not the obligations. [read post]
13 Aug 2014, 6:06 am
The article discussed, amongst other things, disreputable landlords making a profit from low income tenants. [read post]
13 Aug 2014, 3:59 am
”[v] If SEC or other proposed federal regulation of cybersecurity becomes a reality, implementing the Framework could be a mandatory exercise. [read post]
10 Aug 2014, 12:30 am
The first book is a dissection of the Trayvon Martin case with a highly critical analysis of the prosecution’s presentation in People v. [read post]
7 Aug 2014, 11:39 pm
Henley Regatta v. [read post]
7 Aug 2014, 12:21 pm
Unfair to profit from deliberate use of someone’s protected mark, unless exception is shown. [read post]
6 Aug 2014, 9:01 pm
Wade and Planned Parenthood v. [read post]
6 Aug 2014, 7:19 pm
In People v Schreier, 22 NY3d 494 [2014], the Court made clear that surreptitiousness is a separate and distinct element from whether the recording was done without the subject’s knowledge or consent, and is also separate and distinct from the requirement that the recording took place in a location where the subject had a reasonable expectation of privacy (both of which are also required by the statute). [read post]
5 Aug 2014, 9:01 pm
Supreme Court decided the case of Paroline v. [read post]
4 Aug 2014, 10:23 pm
If I see a CCIA brief that any significant part of its membership openly disagrees with (such as in Oracle v. [read post]
1 Aug 2014, 2:54 am
" But a rather angry sounding PRCA rejected the offer and accused the CLA of "downplaying" the issue by limiting the people who could attend. [read post]
30 Jul 2014, 10:32 am
Nonetheless, people are intrigued with the idea of incorporating in Delaware. [read post]
