Search for: "Plaintiff(s)" Results 2381 - 2400 of 178,370
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 May 2024, 1:49 pm by Jeff DeFrancisco
Reportedly, the plaintiff asserted breach of implied warranty, strict liability, and negligence claims against the defendants, alleging that the injuries were a result of the defendant’s defective design and manufacture of the vehicle. [read post]
20 May 2024, 1:37 pm by Brian Lipshutz
EPA, the court denied several petitions for review of EPA’s RFS rulemaking for 2020, 2021, and 2022. [read post]
20 May 2024, 1:25 pm by jordan
Most personal injury plaintiffs will opt for a trial in front of a jury. [read post]
20 May 2024, 11:41 am by Daniel M. Kowalski
Wright II granted the plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment in a set of claims concerning ICE’s “knock-and-talk” practice in Kidd v Mayorkas , a class action lawsuit challenging ICE’s deceptive home arrest practices in Los Angeles and the surrounding region. [read post]
20 May 2024, 9:44 am
Today's advance release election law opinion: Markley v. [read post]
20 May 2024, 9:25 am by Ligia
However, in the event that your case goes to trial, your lawyer can file a pre-trial motion called a motion in limine to suppress the plaintiffs immigration status from being used as evidence or an argument in the trial [4]. [read post]
20 May 2024, 7:39 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
Plaintiff found out about the adverse ruling by running a search on the MSPB's website. [read post]
20 May 2024, 6:30 am
Indeed, in that very context, recently, the Delaware Supreme Court, in AmerisourceBergen (discussed below), overturned the Court of Chancery’s pleading-stage dismissal of Caremark claims in connection with that company’s role in the national opioid crisis. [read post]
20 May 2024, 6:30 am
Indeed, in that very context, recently, the Delaware Supreme Court, in AmerisourceBergen (discussed below), overturned the Court of Chancery’s pleading-stage dismissal of Caremark claims in connection with that company’s role in the national opioid crisis. [read post]
20 May 2024, 6:26 am by Kevin LaCroix
District Court for the District of New Jersey‘s 1989 decision in Cammer v. [read post]
20 May 2024, 5:57 am by Allan Blutstein
.) -- on renewed summary judgment uncontested by plaintiff, ruling that: (1) FBI established that it performed a reasonable search for records related to plaintiffs conviction for manufacturing child pornography, in part, by averring that it “searched all locations and files reasonably likely to contain responsive records, and there is no basis for the FBI to conclude that a search elsewhere would reasonably be expected to locate responsive records subject to… [read post]
20 May 2024, 5:00 am
  The Court's companion Order can be viewed HERE.I thank Attorney James M. [read post]
20 May 2024, 4:55 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Marcentel, to serve as the plaintiffs supervisor. [read post]
20 May 2024, 4:30 am by Eric B. Meyer
There are two potential layers of hearsay here: (1) the supervisor’s comment and (2) the coworker’s communication about it to the plaintiff. [read post]
20 May 2024, 4:26 am by Becky (Hyun Jeong) Baek
Oral Argument and Decision on Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss Justice Schecter’s first question out the gate set the tone for the rest of the argument: I really want to focus on the agreement that was signed… Why does that not utterly refute the plaintiffs claims here in every single way? [read post]
20 May 2024, 4:14 am by Mark Tabakman
” The employer sought to dismiss the case last year, but the Judge ordered the parties to submit the matter of the workers’ classification(s) to the USDOL. [read post]
20 May 2024, 4:10 am by Howard Friedman
Plaintiff additionally filed a Memorandum in Support of Its Motion for Preliminary Injunction (full text). [read post]
19 May 2024, 11:00 pm
CHECKS REFLECTED THAT THE DISPUTED INVOICE HAD BEEN FULLY PAIDIn a commercial claims case brought in the Kings County Civil Court, CEH&AC alleged that it was owed money for heating system services provided to MRE&P.While the plaintiff alleged that some $2,203.94 was due, after a hearing (and a review of the defendant’s payment receipts), the judge ended up dismissing the case.On appeal, the Appellate Term, Second Department, noted that the defendant’s… [read post]