Search for: "Sales v. State"
Results 2381 - 2400
of 21,151
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Dec 2017, 3:41 am
Financial Adviser Settles Charges for Defrauding Private Equity Fund Investors (SEC Litigation Release No. 24003) https://www.sec.gov/litigation/litreleases/2017/lr24003.htmPursuant to Securities and Exchange Commission v. [read post]
23 Jun 2017, 7:22 am
" Eidos Display, LLC et al v. [read post]
5 Aug 2024, 5:15 am
On Thursday, the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit published an opinion in Compulife Software, Inc., v. [read post]
5 Aug 2024, 5:15 am
On Thursday, the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit published an opinion in Compulife Software, Inc., v. [read post]
22 Dec 2009, 12:31 pm
But the judge got a big ol' Walmart gift card from the Fed Circuit today when that court affirmed his actions in the i4i v. [read post]
23 Jun 2008, 3:25 pm
Corp. v. [read post]
2 Feb 2012, 6:28 am
Supreme Court is considering another case, Chistopher v. [read post]
22 Oct 2013, 7:26 am
The Court held in Performance Marketing Association, Inc. v. [read post]
11 Nov 2022, 1:10 am
Judgment, U.S. v. [read post]
4 Apr 2014, 9:08 am
Under the Securities Litigation Uniform Standards Act of 1998 (or “SLUSA”), federal law ordinarily precludes the bringing of state law-based class actions if they allege a misrepresentation or omission of a material fact “in connection with” the purchase or sale of a covered security. [read post]
7 Jan 2015, 12:08 pm
Here's a crime that doesn't fill up a plethora of pages in the California Appellate Reports: a state criminal prosecution of the owner of twelve Subway restaurants for underpaying state sales tax revenue.Notwithstanding the prosecution, white collar criminals everywhere should be happy at the underlying events. [read post]
4 Apr 2014, 9:08 am
Under the Securities Litigation Uniform Standards Act of 1998 (or “SLUSA”), federal law ordinarily precludes the bringing of state law-based class actions if they allege a misrepresentation or omission of a material fact “in connection with” the purchase or sale of a covered security. [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 6:46 pm
In Chappell v. [read post]
30 Oct 2011, 4:24 pm
Mark V. [read post]
9 Nov 2012, 5:01 am
” Three years later, in Back to the Internet Taxation Future, reacting to a reappearance of the proposal to permit state 1 to require retailers in state 2 with no state 1 connection to be taxed by state 1, I explained why progress had not been made, pointing out the inability of legislators and others to distinguish between sales and use taxes, the silliness of claims that internet retailers are not required to collect sales taxes at all… [read post]
18 Jul 2012, 1:57 pm
In Greth Development v. [read post]
4 May 2015, 8:51 am
The Supreme Court, taking quick action on two states’ constitutional challenge to Colorado’s new marijuana sales policy, asked the federal government on Monday for its reaction to that case (144 Original, Nebraska and Oklahoma v. [read post]
25 Apr 2012, 1:16 pm
Kekauoha-Alisa, et al. v. [read post]
24 Aug 2020, 6:41 am
” (Cite to Dart v. [read post]
20 Jun 2017, 11:59 am
Merriman v. [read post]
