Search for: "Sharp v. Sharp"
Results 2381 - 2400
of 4,115
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Aug 2013, 9:45 am
Prof Uelmen thought the best opinion of the year was Justice Liu's concurrence in People v. [read post]
5 Aug 2013, 9:59 pm
The UK High Court recently gave its judgment in the case of Merck, Sharp & Dohme Corp. and Bristol-Myers Squibb Pharmaceuticals Ltd (collectively referred to in the judgement as BMS) v Teva Pharma B.V. and Teva UK Ltd (Teva) (decision). [read post]
4 Aug 2013, 12:46 pm
Supreme Court ruled in Bolling v. [read post]
1 Aug 2013, 6:00 am
American Express v. [read post]
1 Aug 2013, 5:00 am
American Express v. [read post]
30 Jul 2013, 9:01 pm
Although it was the product of a 2-1 split decision, the ruling in United States v. [read post]
30 Jul 2013, 10:53 am
The case remains one where the policy has markedly disparate effects between groups of persons, even if the groups have no sharp edges. [read post]
30 Jul 2013, 10:53 am
The case remains one where the policy has markedly disparate effects between groups of persons, even if the groups have no sharp edges. [read post]
30 Jul 2013, 10:53 am
The case remains one where the policy has markedly disparate effects between groups of persons, even if the groups have no sharp edges. [read post]
17 Jul 2013, 4:47 pm
In Descamps, Justice Kagan wrote for the Supreme Court on an issue that permeates our work as federal defenders: what impact do prior convictions have on our clients’ freedom? [read post]
16 Jul 2013, 12:07 pm
A three-judge panel for The Court of Appeals for the First District of Texas last week ruled that a trial court erred in denying a local television news station the use of the state's anti-SLAPP ("Strategic Lawsuits Against Public Participation") law as a defense in a defamation claim by the founder of a school for special needs students.Justice Jim Sharp wrote the 21-page opinion in KTRK Television, Inc. v. [read post]
15 Jul 2013, 5:38 am
At trial, the Queens County jury awarded $549,000 as follows: $250,000 for pain and suffering $275,000 for punitive damages and $24,000 for economic loss The entire award has been affirmed in Espinal v. [read post]
13 Jul 2013, 11:43 pm
Cooper and Missouri v. [read post]
8 Jul 2013, 11:11 am
Sharp and the Supreme Court’s 1967 opinion in Loving v. [read post]
8 Jul 2013, 5:15 am
Deen cites to Hollingsworth v. [read post]
8 Jul 2013, 3:03 am
Quoting from Ferolito v. [read post]
5 Jul 2013, 6:16 am
Sharpe, the federal companion to Brown v. [read post]
3 Jul 2013, 11:33 am
On July 1, 2013, the United States District Court for the Northern District of California issued an order (pdf) granting, in part, Plaintiffs’ motion for attorneys fees in Wild Equity Institute v. [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 10:52 am
Stoltz gets a criminal trial.Mind you, as a non- (or only partially-) legal matter, I will note the sharp contrast between the type of punishment the military thought was appropriate and what Stoltz is facing in federal court. [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 7:34 am
On Monday, June 24, Justice Ginsburg summarized her sharp disagreement with the ruling in Fisher v. [read post]
