Search for: "State v. Akins"
Results 2381 - 2400
of 2,749
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Oct 2018, 10:47 am
Should social media platforms be subject to a statutory duty of care, akin to occupiers’ liability or health and safety, with the aim of protecting against online harms? [read post]
6 Jan 2025, 5:51 am
An excerpt from Friday's long decision in State v. [read post]
24 Mar 2022, 9:28 am
Phillips: Yesterday in oral argument in ZF Automotive US, Inc. v. [read post]
27 Jul 2021, 6:06 am
In Borngne v. [read post]
17 Dec 2024, 6:07 am
” Gude v. [read post]
10 Aug 2021, 9:01 pm
One of the first arguments in the Supreme Court’s October 2021 Term will be in Servotronics, Inc. v. [read post]
30 Nov 2022, 3:08 am
In the United States, the debates on an artist’s fair use defense have been simmering catalyzed by the famous the case, Prince v. [read post]
18 Apr 2010, 7:01 am
Fricke v. [read post]
16 Aug 2024, 1:30 am
First, Kerr says that Smith is inconsistent with United States v. [read post]
3 Sep 2015, 9:01 pm
Based on the quoted language, however, it appears to be the 2001 holding in Ohio v. [read post]
19 May 2011, 1:15 pm
The court in Deutsch v. [read post]
18 Sep 2007, 12:42 pm
A third significant and publicly accessible case involves the constitutionality of a particular federal regulation of child pornography (United States v. [read post]
20 Jan 2022, 12:36 pm
Nonetheless, it concluded that Eckhardt's speech was constitutionally protected: [We] apply the two-step analysis espoused in Scott v. [read post]
7 Apr 2024, 9:05 pm
For many business economists and legal academics, the purpose of any business organization is simply stated: to maximize profits. [read post]
3 Jun 2008, 3:19 pm
We have already seen this phenomenon at work in other states with marriage amendments, where courts are trying to figure out whether the amendment precludes public employers from providing domestic partnership benefits because that would be akin to recognizing a status "similar to marriage" for unmarried couples. [read post]
30 Jul 2013, 10:53 am
The question here, though, was whether the bedroom tax policy is “manifestly without reasonable foundation” because the bedroom tax involved a question of high policy – the Secretary of State relied on Humphreys v HMRC [2012] 1 WLR 1545, which, in turn, had applied Stec v UK (2006) 43 EHRR 1017 to argue for a different test depending on the ground of discrimination and the type of policy. [read post]
18 Jul 2017, 9:24 am
(E.g., Joshua Tree Downtown Business Alliance v. [read post]
31 Jan 2022, 5:01 am
But consider a second example, Lunney v. [read post]
3 Aug 2011, 6:05 am
ARTICLE V: COVENANT FOR ASSESSMENTS … Section 4. [read post]
10 Jan 2011, 3:23 pm
This trend was halted by the United States Supreme Court in the summer of 2002 in Holmes Group, Inc. v. [read post]
