Search for: "State v. First Judicial District Court" Results 2381 - 2400 of 9,084
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 May 2019, 12:05 pm by John Elwood
United States, 18-6859, and Santos v. [read post]
2 Jan 2019, 6:39 am by MBettman
The First District Court of Appeals upheld the trial court’s ruling in a split decision authored by Judge Dennis Deters and joined by Judge Russell Mock. [read post]
27 Sep 2023, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
First, if the district lines are invalidated, it will be very important for the state courts to make clear they are basing their ruling on the state, rather than the federal, constitution. [read post]
11 Jun 2013, 5:35 am by Sarah Erickson-Muschko
Kevin Russell was among the counsel on an amicus brief filed by former senators in support of Edith Windsor in United States v. [read post]
The Supreme Court’s election to pass on the issue is particularly significant because challenges to Louisiana Department of Environmental Quality (LDEQ) permits must be brought in the 19th Judicial District Court, which is within the jurisdiction of the First Circuit Court of Appeal. [read post]
14 Mar 2012, 5:41 pm by Kathleen L. Ford
The district court denied the motion, holding that the Broughton-Cruz rule, as established by Broughton v. [read post]
21 Jun 2007, 8:03 am
In the third and final ruling of the day, the Court decided that it does not violate the First Amendment for a state prep sports group to enforce a no-recruiting rule on prep athletes. [read post]
21 Mar 2016, 6:52 am by Ross Runkel
The Court in its 1978 decision Christiansburg Garment Co. v. [read post]
6 Aug 2012, 11:13 am by Howard Friedman
The court dismissed these claims on 11th Amendment and quasi-judicial immunity grounds. [read post]
5 Jan 2012, 5:21 am
The Louisiana Court of Appeal agreed with the district court's decision to dismiss some of Alan's claims in Kite v. [read post]
4 Aug 2015, 3:10 pm by Andrew Crocker
EFF’s Long History of Trying to Stop NSA Spying in the Courts EFF first sued over the tapping into AT&T’s fiber optic cables in 2006 in a case called Hepting v. [read post]
9 Sep 2016, 12:17 pm by Arthur F. Coon
In a published opinion filed August 31, 2016, the Sixth Appellate District Court of Appeal rejected claims under CEQA and the Surface Mining and Reclamation Act (“SMARA”; Pub. [read post]
1 Mar 2012, 5:42 am by Victoria VanBuren
The court supported its decision by citing Pennsylvania Railroad Co. v. [read post]