Search for: "State v. Governor"
Results 2381 - 2400
of 7,131
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Aug 2008, 3:41 pm
Lemons v. [read post]
5 Dec 2008, 1:18 pm
Bonner, et al. v. [read post]
5 Mar 2014, 6:50 am
It looked to its decision in Cipolla v Rhode Island College, Board of Governors for Higher Education for guidance. [read post]
11 Sep 2023, 9:05 am
AB 1307 is aimed at correcting to some extent problems with CEQA that were highlighted by the recent appellate decision in Make UC a Good Neighbor v. [read post]
12 Jan 2017, 12:18 pm
This practice has been vigorously opposed by REBA which filed a successful lawsuit effectively barring the practice in REBA v. [read post]
14 Oct 2014, 5:30 am
For example, the court in United States v. [read post]
4 Aug 2008, 5:43 pm
State Dept. [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 7:45 am
After the Governor reviews the individual, the state’s senate must confirm the nomination. [read post]
18 Aug 2016, 10:30 am
Such was the case yesterday when word came out that California Governor Jerry Brown was signing AB 2159 into law. [read post]
24 Mar 2020, 2:03 pm
In a March 22nd letter to the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System and the U.S. [read post]
13 Sep 2011, 8:00 am
v=mlWKptW74CY&feature=player_embedded#! [read post]
29 Oct 2008, 6:19 pm
But the governor and the state AG's office want Ted Olson (left), the impressively-jowled former Solicitor General who argued for Bush against Gore. [read post]
18 Nov 2018, 7:12 pm
State Bd. of Ed. v. [read post]
18 Nov 2018, 7:12 pm
State Bd. of Ed. v. [read post]
25 Nov 2008, 5:36 pm
In other words, Governor Crist, do the intelligent thing in response to this opinion. [read post]
23 Apr 2014, 3:07 pm
On January 17, 2014, California Governor Jerry Brown declared a “State of Emergency” in California due to the severity of drought conditions across the State. [read post]
18 Apr 2014, 11:18 am
On January 17, 2014, California Governor Jerry Brown declared a “State of Emergency” in California due to the severity of drought conditions across the State. [read post]
9 Sep 2022, 4:00 am
In Planned Parenthood of Michigan v. [read post]
12 Dec 2018, 4:00 am
Taylor Law amended to clarify an employee organization's duty of fair representation of non-members in a collective bargaining unit Section 209-a.2 of the Civil Service LawIn Janus v American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees, Council 31, et al, 138 SCt 2448, the Supreme Court held that "States and public-sector unions may no longer extract agency fees from nonconsenting employees. [read post]
12 Dec 2018, 4:00 am
Taylor Law amended to clarify an employee organization's duty of fair representation of non-members in a collective bargaining unit Section 209-a.2 of the Civil Service LawIn Janus v American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees, Council 31, et al, 138 SCt 2448, the Supreme Court held that "States and public-sector unions may no longer extract agency fees from nonconsenting employees. [read post]
