Search for: "State v. Losee" Results 2381 - 2400 of 13,222
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Oct 2024, 3:37 pm by Samuel Bray
The first use of the phrase was Canal Auth. of State of Fla. v. [read post]
11 Sep 2015, 1:42 pm
According to the agreement, the acquirer would pay an amount in cash equal to $8.50 per share for each outstanding share of defendant's common stock, and each share of preferred stock would be converted into the right to receive the sum of $25.00 in cash plus an amount equal to any accrued and unpaid dividends up to but excluding the closing date of the merger.Plaintiff feltaggrieved because holders of the preferred stock would lose their right to receive future… [read post]
4 Dec 2015, 3:34 am by Amy Howe
Abbott, the “one person, one vote” challenge to the state legislative maps in Texas. [read post]
28 Aug 2011, 2:33 pm by Eugene Volokh
(Eugene Volokh) Here’s one thing that puzzles me about United States v. [read post]
19 Dec 2019, 5:59 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
If they lose the hearing, the parents have to appeal to the State Commissioner of Education. [read post]
27 Mar 2013, 5:58 am by Susan Brenner
IT'LL PROBABLY BE ME -- no it will be me -- BUT WHAT HAVE I GOT TO LOSE? [read post]
1 Apr 2016, 4:02 pm by INFORRM
In this regard, Facebook denies that it had actual knowledge or the relevant awareness that would cause it to lose the regulation 19 defence. [read post]
3 Sep 2018, 8:14 am by JEMIMA LOVATT
The York Antwerp Rules state three clear principles, all of which must be met in order for the rule to be applied. [read post]
5 Jan 2011, 1:48 pm by Sheldon Toplitt
Image via WikipediaTwice-unsuccessful Georgia gubernatorial candidate Ray McBerry's defamation suit against a couple of  political bloggers and a woman who claims McBerry had an inappropriate relationship with her teenage daughter, has taken a decidedly unpleasant turn, according to reports in The Atlanta Journal-Constitution and The Huffington Post.In  Ray McBerry v. [read post]
7 Dec 2010, 6:28 am by PaulKostro
The court in Aronow did, however, consider the issue of fault, stating: The majority rule in this country concerning the disposition of engagement rings is a fault rule: the party who unjustifiably breaks the engagement loses the ring. [read post]