Search for: "United States v. Holder"
Results 2381 - 2400
of 4,280
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 May 2013, 10:30 am
United States v. [read post]
21 May 2013, 12:33 pm
Various legal changes from the 1980s onwards in the United States have been identified as responsible for making the American legal climate friendlier to patent holders, which in turn has spurred more applications. [read post]
21 May 2013, 5:31 am
But that doesn't mean this outlier will have been the last case in which a United States district court with a FRAND contract (and rate-setting) case before it precludes a patent holder from enforcing potential or actual ITC remedies. [read post]
16 May 2013, 6:52 pm
In Romeike v. [read post]
16 May 2013, 2:00 pm
Zoe Lofgren (D-CA) stated that “the actions of the department have in fact impaired the First Amendment. [read post]
16 May 2013, 6:52 am
United States, a case involving a criminal prosecution under the Chemical Weapons Convention Implementation Act that is scheduled for oral argument in October. [read post]
Bowman v Monsanto: the US Supreme Court rules on patent exhaustion and replication of patented seeds
14 May 2013, 2:09 pm
Yesterday, the Supreme Court of the United States delivered its long-awaited judgment in the case of Bowman v Monsanto Co. et Al., unanimously ruling that 'patent exhaustion does not permit a farmer to reproduce patented seeds through planting and harvesting without the patent holder's permission'. [read post]
14 May 2013, 7:19 am
United States, a challenge to the constitutionality of court-martial jurisdiction over a civilian contractor. [read post]
13 May 2013, 8:38 am
(Photo credit: Wikipedia)In its 15-page opinion in Righthaven LLC v. [read post]
13 May 2013, 7:30 am
United States v. [read post]
11 May 2013, 6:00 am
**In passing, Diamond v. [read post]
10 May 2013, 11:22 pm
Robart's Microsoft v. [read post]
9 May 2013, 2:54 pm
However, the European Commission's preliminary assessment is that the license agreement underlying that rate-setting case came into being under anticompetitive circumstances, calling into question whether there even is an enforceable agreement in place.Alternatively to a process in Germany, Google "suggest[ed] the [arbitration] panel [in the United States] employ a 'baseball arbitration' procedure to resolve any areas in which the parties are unable to reach agreement" (emphasis… [read post]
9 May 2013, 9:22 am
One of the central policy issues injected into the current case of AMP v. [read post]
6 May 2013, 11:19 pm
Late on Monday, a group of amici curiae ("friends of the court") asked the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit for permission to file an amicus brief in support of Samsung, opposing Apple's pursuit of injunctive relief following a multiplicity of infringement findings by a district court. [read post]
6 May 2013, 6:44 am
The Third District’s opinion in Aventura Management, LLC v. [read post]
3 May 2013, 10:34 am
Notably, for some companies, (e.g., 1st United Bancorp, Inc.) registration via Form S-4 has served as the avenue of “going public. [read post]
Federal Circuit denies Google motion to terminate Apple's appeal of Wisconsin rate-setting dismissal
3 May 2013, 9:23 am
Already, LLC v. [read post]
3 May 2013, 1:58 am
If so, is this state of affairs desirable or does it require correction? [read post]
