Search for: "United States v. State of La."
Results 2381 - 2400
of 2,787
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Feb 2014, 3:36 pm
Sec’y United States DOL, 2014 U.S. [read post]
21 Oct 2010, 4:26 am
ATC, Duran, Valera and Acevedo are charged with one count of conspiracy to defraud the United States, to receive health care kickbacks and to pay health care kickbacks. [read post]
24 May 2017, 3:16 am
The Supreme Court of the United States defined what is considered illegal obscenity in what has become known as “the Miller test” from Miller v. [read post]
2 Dec 2011, 2:00 pm
Sanofi-Aventis United States LLC, 2011 WL 3666595, at *3 (W.D. [read post]
21 Nov 2008, 11:36 am
You can separately subscribe to the Pharma & Biotech edition of the IP Think Tank Global Week in Review by subscribing by email, or selecting ‘all posts’ or ‘Pharma, Biotech & Chem’ for the RSS option at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: Plavix (Clopidogrel) – Canada: Supreme Court upholds selection patents: Apotex v Sanofi-Synthelabo Canada et al (Pharmacapsules @ Gowlings)… [read post]
8 Dec 2021, 9:32 am
Plaintiff alleges that on August 2, 2013, Defendant again became intoxicated, physically forced Plaintiff to leave their joint hotel room and stated that he wanted "20 men to rape" her. [read post]
1 Jul 2021, 3:00 am
Two separate classes of landowners are included in the suit as well as the United States. [read post]
25 Jun 2015, 3:34 pm
La. [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 11:19 am
Recent developments in Texas, United States, and international energy law. [read post]
14 May 2015, 11:14 am
Arnold is admitted to practice in all state courts in North Carolina, in the United States Federal Court for the Western District of North Carolina, in the North Carolina Court of Appeals and Supreme Court, and in the Fourth Circuit United States Court of Appeals in Richmond, Virginia. [read post]
31 Jan 2025, 6:12 am
United States, should not suffice. [read post]
12 Jun 2011, 5:34 am
Two recent news items on the United Kingdom's Digital Economy Act 2010 (DEA) have questioned the Act’s legitimacy and put its very existence under strain: 1. [read post]
7 May 2010, 12:50 am
ZR 27/07 (EPLAW) Appeals Court: Düsseldorf: RapidShare doesn't need to filter user uploads (Ars Technica) (TorrentFreak) India Tales from decrypt dept – guest post on s 65A Copyright Amendment Bill (Spicy IP) Netherlands BREIN wants Usenet provider to start filtering (TorrentFreak) File-sharers are content industry’s ‘largest customers’ (Ars Technica) United Kingdom Gmail settlement reached (Class 46) United… [read post]
16 Feb 2010, 11:22 am
Schellinger Brothers v. [read post]
22 Jan 2012, 9:56 am
Travel v. [read post]
4 Nov 2022, 12:30 pm
The Miss United States of America pageant only allows "natural born females. [read post]
21 Dec 2009, 5:24 am
Century City Apartments Property Services CC and Another v Century City Property Owners Association (Afro-IP) Spain A branding miracle from: from bullring to shop windows (Class 46) Ukraine Ukrainian Higher Economic Court denies Ferrero’s claim on Raffaello trade mark infringement: Group Ferrero v Landrin (Class 46) United Kingdom EWHC on compensation for employee inventors whose patents are particularly beneficial to employers: Shanks… [read post]
25 Jun 2009, 4:29 am
Iowa Feb. 17, 2006) ("the plain language of §1507 states that judicial notice of the regulation is mandatory"). [read post]
23 Jan 2019, 8:33 pm
This case, Pierre Fabre Dermo-Cosmétique SAS v Président de l’Autorité de la concurrence and Ministre de l’Économie, de l’Industrie et de l’Emploi, Case C-439/09, involved certain cosmetics and hygiene products, manufactured by Pierre Fabre Dermo-Cosmetique and sold mainly through pharmacists. [read post]
The Indian Satellite Saga and Retaliation: Recognizing the Supreme Court of India’s Judgment Abroad?
24 Jun 2024, 7:03 pm
Since 2023, courts worldwide, including those in Australia, Canada, Germany, Mauritius, the Netherlands, Singapore, Switzerland, and the US, rendered decisions regarding whether to recognize the SCI Judgment and to allow it as a defence against the enforcement of arbitration awards.[1] This Insight analyzes these courts’ judgments and reflects on the decentralized judgment/award recognition and enforcement system for addressing alleged state retaliation measures. [read post]
