Search for: "We Don't Judge - We Defend"
Results 2381 - 2400
of 6,918
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Dec 2008, 6:40 am
So don't be surprised when you see the victim sitting in the front row throughout the trial. [read post]
4 Nov 2007, 7:20 am
If either of those things had happened, even we wouldn't consider arguing for preemption in this case.But they didn't. [read post]
6 Jul 2007, 10:11 am
(If the NSA did not, in fact, surveille any of them, I can think of no good reason -- certainly not a so-called state secrets privilege -- why the agency could not inform the court of that fact.)To be sure, we don't know for certain which plaintiffs, or which clients, were surveilled. [read post]
17 Aug 2006, 11:14 am
And the defendants, our government, has arguments about the legality of the program that don't rely on secrets (but do rely on incorrect legal arguments). [read post]
12 Oct 2010, 10:42 pm
By Mike Dorf With yesterday's ruling by Judge Phillips striking down "Don't Ask Don't Tell," we appear to have reached a tipping point on judicial willingness to act to protect gay rights. [read post]
27 Oct 2007, 2:12 pm
"I don't even know why I'm here. [read post]
27 Nov 2007, 12:53 pm
"I don't know," Gordon replied. [read post]
5 May 2011, 6:45 am
Likewise, plaintiff couldn’t blame the defendant for not investigating its inadequate damages proffer:Defendants’ “actual knowledge” [that] Plaintiff intended to call an expert long after the deadline for designating an expert has expired did not cure the Plaintiff's failure to comply with the court’s Discovery Plan and Scheduling Order, or the Plaintiff's failure to meet it’s discovery disclosure obligations. [read post]
26 Jan 2012, 11:07 am
The main lesson here is don't speak with police without your lawyer. [read post]
7 Jun 2007, 11:06 am
The Court of Appeal didn't just agree. [read post]
1 Jun 2010, 4:50 am
Judges don't think otherwise. [read post]
17 Oct 2022, 7:15 am
Even if the defendants didn’t make the arguments, the judge should have listened to her instincts and intervened on the consuming public’s behalf. [read post]
22 Oct 2006, 12:49 pm
I don't really feel like having more pervs find this post via Google, anyway. [read post]
14 Jan 2007, 7:44 pm
Don't forget Mr. [read post]
16 Aug 2007, 7:20 am
Those are the kinds of information we really like to know from prescribers - how they judge the science; how they judge the drug; and how they judge the company. [read post]
11 Aug 2008, 5:44 am
Since it has never been tested as far as I'm aware, we don't know. [read post]
18 Oct 2009, 5:16 am
People don't just go around confessing to crimes they didn't commit. [read post]
10 Apr 2019, 10:44 am
Div. 2019) See also: US FDA Moves to Further Regulate Marijuana Products (WorkersCompensationBlog 4/9/19) New Jersey workers' compensation judge has ordered this municipality to cover the cost of a municipal employee's medical marijuana NJ Expands Access to Medical Marijuana to Include Common Work-Related Conditions NJ Governor Murphy Signs Executive Order Mandating Review of Medical Marijuana Policy NJ Calls for Big Increase in Number of Medical… [read post]
9 Aug 2010, 8:09 am
We still don't have any resolution, and as state sorts out who should appeal where, it appears that we could be waiting awhile before this saga comes to what is likely to be an unsatisfying end.Earlier coverage begins with this post. [read post]
23 Jul 2021, 8:18 am
“Why Don’t Malpractice Policies Typically Cover Consulting Work? [read post]
