Search for: "Corporations A, B, and C" Results 2401 - 2420 of 7,270
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Nov 2013, 9:00 am
There must have been an awful lot of evidence to read, because it wasn't until January 2010 that the Opposition Division dismissed the Article 8(1)(b) opposition since there was no likelihood of confusion. [read post]
7 Feb 2010, 9:21 pm by Randall Reese
"About netDockets:With over 1.6 million documents filed in over 900 of the largest corporate chapter 11 bankruptcy cases, all professionally-coded to be quickly and easily searchable, netDockets allows you to find not just more precedent, but the best, most relevant precedent.Learn more and sign up for a free trial account by visiting http://www.netdockets.com/. [read post]
29 May 2011, 8:21 am by Howard Friedman
 and the institution meets the provisions of paragraphs (a)(1)(i), (a)(1)(ii), or (b) of this section. [read post]
19 Apr 2011, 1:29 pm by Goldberg Segalla LLP
For a copy of the decision click here Patrick Omilian and Rick Cohen http://www.goldbergsegalla.com/attorneys/paul-c-steck http://www.goldbergsegalla.com/attorneys/richard-j-cohen [read post]
20 Mar 2019, 8:43 am by Anthony Bareno
LLCs may elect to be a S-Corporation or a C-Corporation, which means the LLC is not taxed, but instead the income flows through the tax returns of the members. [read post]
16 Jul 2010, 3:03 pm
”   Non-accelerated filers are permanently exempted from the internal control rules of Sarbanes-Oxley Section 404(b). [read post]
31 Jan 2015, 8:24 pm
(Pix (c) Larry Catá Backer 2015) Professor James Stewart, of the Faculty of Law at the University of British Columbia, has produced a valuable on line symposium: Business and Human Rights: Next Steps. [read post]
9 Jan 2012, 5:48 am by Vanessa Schoenthaler
The fair value and notional value of the purchased credit protection. c. [read post]
3 Dec 2019, 3:13 pm by Adam Schwartz
This protection, in section105(b), is an important one. [read post]
29 Nov 2007, 10:11 am
 26(b)(2)(B) and 26(b)(2)(C), and found that the disputed discovery requests sought evidence that was relevant, and in some cases, “pivotal” to the issues in the case. [read post]