Search for: "Doe v Great Expectations"
Results 2401 - 2420
of 3,541
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Dec 2011, 6:53 am
How often does the best Daubert decision of the year come from a state court? [read post]
5 Aug 2023, 3:00 am
His public comment to The History of Public Adjusting—Samuel Milch v. [read post]
27 Dec 2022, 6:30 am
REV. 2110-2124 (1993).I indicated that I wrote about whatever happened to interest me and that I frankly did not expect any judges to be interested in what I had to say. [read post]
18 May 2012, 10:44 am
Khuzami pointed to a principle from a 1973 Second Circuit Court of Appeals as a reason for the Commission's historical successes: "the Commission 'can bring the large number of enforcement actions it does only because in all but a few cases consent decrees are entered.'" SEC v. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 10:32 am
One would expect the Takings Clause and the Due Process Clause to set different limits on condemnation power, because in the Constitution, “every word in the document has independent meaning, ‘that no word was unnecessarily used, or needlessly added. [read post]
29 Nov 2011, 1:20 am
Great story right? [read post]
2 Sep 2011, 9:13 am
Milward v. [read post]
5 Aug 2018, 9:01 pm
In Janus v. [read post]
8 Apr 2013, 6:47 am
Last week’s arguments in US v. [read post]
24 Jan 2018, 3:24 am
”A series of serious crimes widely described as “heinous” occurred in 1993 during the administration of President Fidel V. [read post]
19 Feb 2020, 3:32 am
Judicial ruling strengthening protection of integrity of works The case in question: Muye Zhang v China Film Co. [read post]
31 Dec 2012, 12:01 pm
In Case R 513/2011-2 Société des Produits Nestlé S.A v Cadbury Holdings Ltd, Nestlé appealed a decision of the Cancellation Division finding the three-dimensional Community trade mark, consisting of four trapezoidal bars aligned on a rectangular base for 'Sweets; bakery products, pastries, biscuits; cakes, waffles' in Class 30, was devoid of distinctive character and had therefore been invalidly registered contrary to Art. 7(1)(b), Reg. [read post]
13 Mar 2024, 12:57 pm
It is all, they tell me, limited to the fringes that must be expected in any polity.And, to be clear, I would like to believe that they are right. [read post]
20 Dec 2020, 5:38 am
Few expected to see a push to resolve it now. [read post]
20 Feb 2016, 6:40 am
State v. [read post]
15 Feb 2024, 1:23 pm
One imagines that the court would not expect Musk to work for free. [read post]
17 Oct 2009, 2:12 pm
Here’s another inflammatory way to start out … would forcing boys to be vaccinated against their will but without any medical benefit to them, with the benefits accruing instead to girls, violate Roe v Wade? [read post]
15 Mar 2012, 11:39 am
First Party v. [read post]
22 Jun 2021, 7:42 am
The government’s submission does not propose any changes to the NSA or CIA minimization procedures, nor does it propose changes to the FBI or CIA querying procedures. [read post]
12 Dec 2010, 7:42 am
Viacom v YouTube: Two weeks ago, as expected (so expected, the AmeriKat adds, that she didn't even think it was news), Viacom filed their appeal in the Viacom v YouTube case in the appeals court in New York (see previous AmeriKat posts on the case here). [read post]
