Search for: "Does 1 through 5"
Results 2401 - 2420
of 24,640
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Jan 2008, 8:18 pm
So let 'em talk their 3 or 5 minutes! [read post]
11 Dec 2015, 3:50 am
Section 5(1) must be read as requiring protection order applications to be made without notice to the respondent. [read post]
11 May 2020, 4:00 am
Doorey’s Workplace Law Blog 5. [read post]
15 Jul 2006, 6:15 am
I have actually been questioned about this by Chapter 7 trustees and my response has been to advise the trustee that the means test does not reflect a real budget and it was never intended to represent a real budget. [read post]
5 Jul 2009, 2:58 pm
Doe v. [read post]
8 Jul 2013, 4:13 am
They are:1. [read post]
23 Mar 2020, 1:46 pm
While it is not technically a “stay at home” directive, the Order does limit gatherings to ten (10) people, a reduction from the 25 person limit established in an earlier order.1 Massachusetts residents are permitted to visit: (1) medical facilities; (2) pharmacies; (3) gas stations; (4) restaurants for take-out; (5) grocery stores; (6) banks; (7) medical marijuana shops; and (8) package (liquor) stores, among other businesses providing… [read post]
18 Jul 2017, 3:58 pm
On the other hand, such contextcannot be put aside, and claim 1, through its claiming of a“controlling entity,” is linked to claim 24, which claimsthe same “controlling entity,” raising a question aboutwhether the common entity could be properly understoodas doing more (i.e., diverting) in claim 1 than it does inclaim 24. [read post]
2 Nov 2020, 6:01 am
In the EU-ISS note prepared for the briefing I identified five areas of possible progress on verification-related questions: (1) industry verification; (2) biodefence programmes; (3) technology transfers; (4) allegations of BW use and unusual outbreaks of disease; and (5) countering BW threats posed by terrorist and criminal entities. [read post]
29 Aug 2019, 8:03 pm
Section 5, though, does focus on state duty. [read post]
21 Apr 2010, 11:24 am
It is always through the postal service. [read post]
30 Mar 2011, 4:39 am
This subparagraph expires January 1, 2015, and does not apply to rates for sinkhole coverage or costs for the purchase of private reinsurance, if any. [read post]
24 Jun 2008, 4:17 am
5. [read post]
6 Apr 2016, 12:06 pm
In Daubert, the Court referenced five factors courts could use to determine the reliability of expert scientific testimony: (1) whether the expert’s theory or technique can be (and has been) tested; (2) whether the theory or technique has been subjected to peer review and publication; (3) the known or potential rate of error; (4) the existence and maintenance of standards controlling the technique’s operation; and (5) whether the technique has been generally… [read post]
1 Jun 2018, 4:33 am
These requests most often involve the following: 1. [read post]
4 Apr 2015, 4:02 pm
Mr Justice Mitting seems to be of the opinion that the exclusion of Article 1 of the e-commerce Directive does not make sense, although he does not make the point in relation to the claim for compensation but in relation to the claim for injunctive relief. [read post]
20 Nov 2015, 11:38 pm
So the BAP concluded: the provision for "adequate protection" in § 1325(a)(5)(B)(iii)(II) is not the type of clear, "self executing" provision of the Bankruptcy Code that would preclude the bankruptcy court from translating the Secured Creditors' failures to object to confirmation as acceptance for purposes of § 1325(a)(5)(A) and confirming the Plan as consistent with the requirements of § 1325(a)(1), under Espinosa. [read post]
8 Jul 2016, 12:50 pm
How Does Final Rule 41F Change Current NFA Regulations? [read post]
1 Nov 2007, 6:49 am
Preserving the pendency of an adjustment of status application in this manner does not apply to H-1/ H-4 or L-1/L-2 nonimmigrants who are under exclusion, deportation, or removal proceedings. [read post]
