Search for: "Does 1-29"
Results 2401 - 2420
of 12,789
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 May 2018, 12:55 pm
” No. 17-1726, ECF No. 73, slip op.at 1 –2. [read post]
25 Mar 2015, 5:00 am
Kevin Emerson CollinsFor the Innovation Law Beyond IP 2 conference, March 28-29 at Yale Law School My project follows through on an intuition about the value of architectural copyright that dates from my days as an architect before I went to law school. [read post]
11 Jan 2014, 9:00 am
29 U.S.C. [read post]
22 Feb 2023, 1:21 pm
A mother gets a DVRO (domestic violence restraining order) against her (allegedly) very-drug-abusing 29-year old son who still lives with her. [read post]
28 Jun 2013, 9:14 am
Does “know how“ need to be patentable ? [read post]
25 Jan 2015, 4:26 am
It is true that unlike Article 15(1)(c), Article 5(3) makes no mention of directing activities. [read post]
17 Oct 2016, 9:54 am
Ranks et Vasiļevičs is a case concerning two Latvian nationals who are alleged to have sold copyright-protected Microsoft software on an online marketplace between 29 December 2001 and 22 December 2004 (see also here). [read post]
8 Sep 2014, 2:37 am
Plus, does this legitimate interest of rightholders subsist together with authors' moral rights or rather replace them? [read post]
22 Jan 2015, 4:31 am
You see within ½ mile of the jail are the following: 1 college, 1 elementary school, 1 daycare, 1 senior citizen apartment complex, and numerous neighborhoods. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 10:08 pm
While it is true that the rationale of the absolute grounds under Article 4(1)(e) TMD / Article 7(1)(e) EUTMR is to prevent that trade mark law is used for an (undue) extension of time-limited rights and to avoid that someone acquires a monopoly right when limited options are available or when the aspect of the shape at issue is indissociable from the goods in question, nothing prevents that an object protected by, e.g,, a copyright and/or design right could also access trade mark… [read post]
23 Apr 2020, 12:14 pm
Department of Labor (“DOL”) released a temporary rule (“the Rule”), at 29 C.F.R. [read post]
23 Oct 2020, 10:07 am
29 U.S.C. [read post]
18 Jun 2019, 8:35 am
Many companies will discipline employees that fail to report safety violations because the risks are too high for the company if a problem does arise. [read post]
10 Sep 2012, 6:45 am
All injuries cannot be prevented, but these stats can be an eye opener for any employer that does construction-type work. [read post]
29 Feb 2016, 10:26 pm
(p.29) I got a strong sense that this perception was, at bottom, what drove the outcome in this case. [read post]
24 Jan 2013, 8:21 am
It asked the following questions, one of these concerning the applicability of the Directive ratione temporis and four the interpretation of substantive provisions: 1. [read post]
6 Nov 2013, 9:12 pm
Id. at *29 (text added). [read post]
7 Sep 2015, 6:28 am
Key Precedent 29 U.S.C. 203(e) (Fair Labor Standards Act defines employee as meaning any individual employed by an employer.) 29 U.S.C. 213(a)(1) (Fair Labor Standards Act does not apply minimum wage requirements to “any employee employed…in the capacity of outside salesman. [read post]
30 Oct 2017, 3:19 pm
Telstra Corporation Limited [2016] FCA 857. [2] In contravention of the Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (Cth) sch 2, ss 18, 29(1)(g), 29(1)(h), 29(1)(l) and the Olympic Insignia Act 1987 (Cth) ss 23, 28, 30(2), 36, 38. [3] Australian Olympic Committee, Inc. v. [read post]
30 Oct 2017, 3:19 pm
Telstra Corporation Limited [2016] FCA 857. [2] In contravention of the Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (Cth) sch 2, ss 18, 29(1)(g), 29(1)(h), 29(1)(l) and the Olympic Insignia Act 1987 (Cth) ss 23, 28, 30(2), 36, 38. [3] Australian Olympic Committee, Inc. v. [read post]
