Search for: "Law v. USA"
Results 2401 - 2420
of 6,904
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Sep 2018, 10:00 pm
Teva Pharmaceuticals USA the Supreme Court agreed to answer the question whether secret sales qualify as prior art under the new law. [read post]
7 Feb 2019, 8:19 pm
Case date: 01 February 2019 Case number: No. 2018-1108 Court: United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit A full summary of this case has been published on Kluwer IP Law. [read post]
3 Aug 2010, 12:51 pm
The Circuit Court focused on PUTSA section 5303 and related case law, which allows courts to enjoin actual or threatened misappropriation of trade secrets. [read post]
20 Sep 2021, 1:23 am
Cir. 2012); Adverio Pharma GmbH v. [read post]
19 Apr 2020, 9:00 am
IMAN365-USA, 2020 WL 977969 (N.D. [read post]
19 Dec 2011, 5:55 pm
A copy of the order can be seen here: USA v. [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 3:17 pm
The Yale Law Journal Online has just published three essays on the Supreme Court’s recent decision in Douglas v. [read post]
6 Dec 2017, 4:19 am
The first is Murphy v. [read post]
8 Jun 2018, 4:16 am
At Take Care (cross-posted at The George Washington Law Review’s On the Docket blog), Robert Tuttle and Ira Lupu weigh in on Masterpiece Cakeshop v. [read post]
30 Oct 2017, 2:01 pm
Last time the CJEU reviewed US privacy law, in Schrems v. [read post]
5 Feb 2011, 9:18 am
Back v. [read post]
1 Oct 2016, 6:39 am
Parrot’s reliance on Pandrol USA, LP v. [read post]
20 Jan 2012, 2:34 pm
In association with Bloomberg Law [read post]
13 Jul 2007, 4:07 pm
For the reasons set forth below, we AFFIRM the judgment of the district court. 07a0256p.06 2007/07/10 USA v. [read post]
22 Oct 2019, 9:09 am
The federal district court in Minnesota properly denied Bombardier’s post-trial motion for judgment as a matter of law, the Federal Circuit ruled, rejecting Bombardier’s contention that the strength of its evidence was sufficient to nullify the jury’s verdict (Bombardier Recreational Products Inc. v. [read post]
15 Aug 2020, 4:57 am
The last time I read something that made me feel quite this flavor of incandescent was a decade ago, in law school — it was Scalia’s dissent in Lawrence v. [read post]
31 Mar 2014, 4:45 am
In association with Bloomberg Law [read post]
21 Jun 2013, 7:28 am
(holding that federal law trumps Arizona’s proof-of-citizenship requirement for would-be voters) might have on Shelby County v. [read post]
17 Nov 2009, 11:46 am
Humanitarian Law Project, et al., 08-1498, and Humanitarian Law Project, et al., v. [read post]
2 Dec 2010, 9:16 am
Finn.Finn, John E.Chantilly, VA : Teaching Co., c2006.KF4750 .F56 2006 DVDCivil RightsKF372 .J36 2010Root and branch : Charles Hamilton Houston, Thurgood Marshall, and the struggle to end segregation / Rawn James, Jr.James, Rawn.New York, N.Y. : Bloomsbury Press, 2010.Civil RightsKF4155 .S77 2010Mendez v. [read post]
