Search for: "MATTER OF B T B"
Results 2401 - 2420
of 20,070
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 May 2022, 7:38 am
You Can’t Complain About Errors You Asked For Illinois law does not let you have your cake and eat it, too. [read post]
13 May 2022, 5:52 am
” Indeed, the category of civilians used as an illustrative example in the DoD Manual — munitions factory workers — are generally considered the paradigmatic case of individuals who must be considered as civilians and treated as such for all law of war matters (including proportionality analysis which can preclude an attack) even though the building in which they work is a lawful military target. [read post]
13 May 2022, 5:30 am
And with beliefs on all sides of the issue, why shouldn't the government be able to regulate or ban abortion? [read post]
13 May 2022, 4:36 am
§ 1003.104(b). [read post]
12 May 2022, 7:21 am
Megayachts or mansions aren’t as immediately liquid because they must be sold. [read post]
12 May 2022, 6:59 am
This isn’t surprising given the ever-expanding level of beneficiary participation and cost of Medicare’s hospice benefit program. [read post]
11 May 2022, 3:51 pm
I don’t make a habit of imagining dissenting opinions. [read post]
11 May 2022, 12:13 pm
Or you might get assigned to Partner B, who’s just a real jerk. [read post]
11 May 2022, 11:12 am
Defaults matter. [read post]
11 May 2022, 4:00 am
"[T]he possibility that a judgment rendered without the omitted party could have an adverse practical effect on that party is enough to indicate joinder" (Matter of Nemeth v K-Tooling, 163 AD3d 1143, 1144 [2018] [internal quotation marks and citations omitted]; see Matter of 27th St. [read post]
11 May 2022, 4:00 am
"[T]he possibility that a judgment rendered without the omitted party could have an adverse practical effect on that party is enough to indicate joinder" (Matter of Nemeth v K-Tooling, 163 AD3d 1143, 1144 [2018] [internal quotation marks and citations omitted]; see Matter of 27th St. [read post]
11 May 2022, 4:00 am
"[T]he possibility that a judgment rendered without the omitted party could have an adverse practical effect on that party is enough to indicate joinder" (Matter of Nemeth v K-Tooling, 163 AD3d 1143, 1144 [2018] [internal quotation marks and citations omitted]; see Matter of 27th St. [read post]
11 May 2022, 4:00 am
"[T]he possibility that a judgment rendered without the omitted party could have an adverse practical effect on that party is enough to indicate joinder" (Matter of Nemeth v K-Tooling, 163 AD3d 1143, 1144 [2018] [internal quotation marks and citations omitted]; see Matter of 27th St. [read post]
11 May 2022, 3:00 am
Our attorneys at Gaylord and Nantias Attorney are here to assist you with your legal matter. [read post]
10 May 2022, 9:01 pm
The NAACP’s further view is that, as a matter of [read post]
10 May 2022, 9:44 am
Under that section, subsection (a)(1)(B), the FTC can “prescribe … rules which define with specificity acts or practices which are unfair or deceptive acts or practices in or affecting commerce. [read post]
9 May 2022, 3:40 pm
[T]o establish a "particularized need" under FED. [read post]
9 May 2022, 8:58 am
GAO’s decision in JW Mills Management, LLC, B-420416 (Mar. 24, 2022), involved a FAR part 12 and 15 solicitation issued by the Department of the Navy as a full HUBZone set-aside. [read post]
7 May 2022, 12:38 pm
Ourada, 972 NE 2d 744 – Ill: Appellate Court, 2nd Dist. 2012 On a question of law, it doesn’t matter how wrong the trial court was. [read post]
7 May 2022, 12:17 pm
Greene's ambiguous statement that "[t]his is our 1776 moment" was a coded call to violent insurrection on January 6, 2021. [read post]
