Search for: "May v. State" Results 2401 - 2420 of 119,555
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 May 2020, 4:16 pm by INFORRM
As already mentioned, on 1 May 2020, Warby J handed down judgment in the Duchess of Sussex v Associated Newspapers [2020] EWHC 1058 (Ch). [read post]
11 Jan 2023, 3:03 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
An attorney discharged without cause may seek recovery in quantum meruit for the reasonable value of his or her services (Butler, Fitzgerald & Potter v Gelmin, 235 AD2d 218,219 [1st Dept 1997]). [read post]
13 Jan 2008, 9:00 am
Moore (06-1082), asking whether prosecutors may introduce evidence seized during an arrest made in violation of state law, and in Preston v. [read post]
1 May 2017, 5:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
”Employers have been sued for alleged defamation of an employee founded on postings made on the employer's web site as the decision in Firth v State of New York, 98 NY2d 365, demonstrates. [read post]
15 May 2008, 1:53 am
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Secretary of State for the Home Department v J N [2008] EWCA Civ 464 (14 May 2008) HM Revenue & Customs v EB Central Services Ltd [2008] EWCA Civ 486 (14 May 2008) Mason & Anor v East Potential Ltd [2008] EWCA Civ 494 (14 May 2008) NS-H v Kingston Upon Hull City Council & Anor [2008] EWCA Civ 493 (14 May 2008) High Court (Chancery Division) Secretary of… [read post]
29 Sep 2015, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
A political subdivision of the State may provide for the defense and indemnification of its officers and employees sued in state or federal court involving the performance of official duties Bonilla v Town of Hempstead, 2015 NY Slip Op 06916, Appellate Division, Second DepartmentFormer Hempstead Town Clerk Mark A. [read post]
13 Dec 2021, 9:31 am by DONALD SCARINCI
Given that the state has expressly asked the Court to overturn its landmark decisions in Roe v. [read post]
11 May 2007, 9:49 am
It reads: "Any alien who applies or has applied for exemption or discharge from training or service in the Armed Forces . . . on the ground that he is an alien, and is or was relieved or discharged from such training or service on such ground, shall be permanently ineligible to become a citizen of the United States. [read post]
25 Feb 2011, 11:50 am by Brian A. Comer
I have been hearing for awhile that there is a chance that the South Carolina State Legislature may take action in response to the South Carolina Supreme Court's decision in Branham v. [read post]