Search for: "Search/Seizure Warrant" Results 2401 - 2420 of 5,473
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Jun 2014, 5:00 pm
This has already led to 227 arrests and 416 search warrants in 35 different states, including Alabama. [read post]
9 Jun 2014, 2:49 pm
A New York Criminal Lawyer said on the day before the disputed arrests and seizures, the police obtained a search warrant. [read post]
9 Jun 2014, 12:22 pm by David Fraser
The police obtained a warrant and searched her residence, where they seized the respondent’s computer. [read post]
9 Jun 2014, 5:56 am
 As I have noted, the 4th Amendment creates a right to be free from “unreasonable” searches and seizures. [read post]
8 Jun 2014, 10:19 am
Is that not a violation of a person's Fourth Amendment right against unreasonable searches and seizures? [read post]
4 Jun 2014, 11:28 am by Stephen Bilkis
However, the court went on to consider the officer’s further testimony that he had noticed a "detectable and identifiable odor of marijuana", and held that "under the totality of the circumstances there was probable cause to arrest and the seizure without a warrant was permissible". [read post]
4 Jun 2014, 10:26 am
They had neither a warrant to search the Carmans' property, nor a warrant to arrest the theft suspect. [read post]
4 Jun 2014, 7:46 am
A search and seizure rule of this type would probably be `unworkable and unreasonable. [read post]
4 Jun 2014, 5:20 am
The friction point is between free speech rights and search and seizure. [read post]
3 Jun 2014, 7:32 am by MBettman
At Oral Argument Defense Argument The seizure of Castagnola’s computer and the exploratory search of that computer was completely unreasonable. [read post]
2 Jun 2014, 3:47 pm
What is reasonable depends on all of the circumstances surrounding the search or seizure and the nature of the search or seizure itself. [read post]
1 Jun 2014, 9:01 pm by Seth Stoughton
Warrantless Vehicle Searches As a general rule, the Fourth Amendment requires police to obtain a warrant before searching. [read post]
30 May 2014, 8:02 am
  A search warrant, based in part on the two firearms seized, was executed on the residence weeks later and an additional 91 firearms were seized. [read post]
26 May 2014, 5:14 am
  As I have noted in prior posts, the 4th Amendment only applies to “state action,” i.e., to searches and seizures that are carried out by agents of the state, such as police officers. [read post]
22 May 2014, 4:43 pm by Howard Iken
Supreme Court heard the case on appeal, Jones contended that the evidence obtained by virtue of the GPS tracking device should be suppressed because it was obtained unlawfully in violation of his Fourth Amendment right against unreasonable search and seizure. [read post]
22 May 2014, 4:43 pm by Howard Iken
Supreme Court heard the case on appeal, Jones contended that the evidence obtained by virtue of the GPS tracking device should be suppressed because it was obtained unlawfully in violation of his Fourth Amendment right against unreasonable search and seizure. [read post]
22 May 2014, 1:48 pm
The Notes of the Criminal Rules Committee that first adopted the two-step procedure in Rule 41 specifically included the following: “The amended rule does not address the specificity of description that the Fourth Amendment may require in a warrant for electronically stored information, leaving the application of this and other constitutional standards concerning both the seizure and the search to ongoing case law development. [read post]
22 May 2014, 1:34 pm by MBettman
Constitution (“The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause… and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized. [read post]
21 May 2014, 4:35 pm by Stephen Bilkis
The defendant asserted that the search and seizure was illegal. [read post]