Search for: "Sharp v. Sharp" Results 2401 - 2420 of 4,115
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Mar 2010, 4:36 pm
(IP Osgoode) Federal Court: IP infringement and director liability: Target Event Production Ltd. v. [read post]
22 Jul 2018, 4:09 pm by INFORRM
Patricia Londono on UKHRB, “Sir Cliff v BBC: A new era for police investigations? [read post]
31 Mar 2019, 11:50 pm by INFORRM
On 25 March 2019, the Court of Appeal refused permission to appeal in the case of Greenstein v Campaign Against Antisemitism On 27 March 2019, the Court of Appeal refused permission to appeal in the case of Monir v Wood. [read post]
1 Jul 2018, 4:08 pm by INFORRM
Rulings IPSO has published three resolution statements and series of rulings from the Complaints Committee: Resolution statement 00062-18 Two individuals v Sunday Express, resolved via IPSO mediation Resolution Statement 02180-18 Flynn v Belfast Telegraph, resolved via IPSO mediation Resolution Statement 03553-18 Appleby v Daily Mail, resolved via IPSO mediation 02869-18 Lamb v shieldsgazette.com, no breach of the ISPO Code 20796-17 A woman v The Argus… [read post]
11 Apr 2011, 3:28 am by INFORRM
  It points out that “You would need to have fairly sharp eyes to spot the apology which appeared in print and online under the heading ‘Gordon Brown’”. [read post]
5 Aug 2008, 8:00 am
Thanks to one of my loyal readers who often points out anti-concurrent cause cases for passing along the Colorado Court of Appeals July 24 decision in Colorado Intergovernmental Risk Sharing Agency v. [read post]
27 Feb 2014, 8:57 am by Ronald Mann
The Justices seemed uncharacteristically out of sync at the argument Tuesday in Robers v. [read post]
5 Aug 2008, 8:00 am
Thanks to one of my loyal readers who often points out anti-concurrent cause cases for passing along the Colorado Court of Appeals July 24 decision in Colorado Intergovernmental Risk Sharing Agency v. [read post]
10 Dec 2009, 7:37 pm
Minority Queen Newman sang her usual sharp tones of dissent, finding barbs for both her brethren and downstream district court. [read post]
12 May 2022, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
Perhaps the best starting point for analysis of the compelled-speech realm remains Wooley v. [read post]
3 Aug 2022, 4:32 am by INFORRM
The judgment of the Court of Appeal All three judges agreed that the appeal should be dismissed but the main judgment was given by Sir Geoffrey Vos and Dame Victoria Sharp. [read post]
3 May 2015, 4:09 pm by INFORRM
Judgments The following reserved judgment in media law cases are outstanding: OPO v MLA, heard 19 and 20 January 2015 (UK Supreme Court) Murray v Associated Newspapers, heard 21 January 2015 (Longmore, Ryder and Sharp LJJ) Various Claimants v MGN, heard 9-13, 18, 24-25 March 2015 (Mann J). [read post]
24 Oct 2021, 4:17 pm by INFORRM
Last Week in the Courts Judgement was handed down in Parkes v Hall and Ors [2021] EWHC 2824 (QB). [read post]
18 Jun 2012, 3:50 am by INFORRM
Other cases included: Mr Peter Light v Hounslow Chronicle, Clause 1, 15/06/2012; RMT Union v Evening Standard, Clause 1, 15/06/2012; A man v The Scottish Sun, Clauses 1, 3, 15/06/2012; A man v Irish News, Clause 3, 15/06/2012; Mr Martin Robbins v Daily Mail, Clause 1, 15/06/2012; Mr Colin Cortbus v Daily Mail, Clause 1, 15/06/2012; Mrs Caroline Panesar v The Mail on Sunday, Clause 4, 15/06/2012; Mrs Caroline Panesar v Daily… [read post]
23 Mar 2015, 12:42 am by INFORRM
On the same day Warby J heard an application in the case of YXB v TNO. [read post]
16 Apr 2021, 1:36 am by Matthias Weller
It is a fascinating account of the foundations („Grundlegung“, Part 1, pp. 3 – 311) of European civil procedure as well as a sharp analysis of the instruments of EU law („Europäisches internationales Zivilprozessrecht“, Part 2, pp. 313 – 782). [read post]