Search for: "Sharp v. Sharp" Results 2401 - 2420 of 4,115
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Jun 2013, 12:51 pm by Vikram Raghavan
Interestingly, their reticence to address this central jurisdictional question is at sharp variance with their counterparts in Perry. [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 6:13 pm by Lisa Milam-Perez
In Vance v Ball State University, the 5-4 majority endorsed a narrow definition of the meaning of “supervisor” for purposes of determining employer liability under Title VII. [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 6:57 am by Joy Waltemath
Supreme Court in a 7-1 decision (Fisher v University of Texas at Austin, June 24, 2013, Kennedy, A). [read post]
22 Jun 2013, 7:02 am by Benjamin Wittes
” Goldsmith agreed* with Wittes’s assessment and noted that, despite the “sharp rhetoric of the policy objections,” the Obama Administration had not “expended any real political capital in support of i [read post]
21 Jun 2013, 12:56 pm by Tejinder Singh
And while last week was all about unanimity, this week the Justices treated us to sharp disagreements and pointed dissents. [read post]
14 Jun 2013, 9:22 am by Lisa Milam-Perez
In Wang v Hearst Corp, a federal judge in New York refused to certify a Rule 23 class of magazine interns who alleged they should have been deemed “employees” and compensated accordingly. [read post]
6 Jun 2013, 9:59 pm by Patent Docs
Merck Canada Inc and Merck Sharp & Dohme Ltd v Sigma Pharmaceuticals plc Prior to their accession to the European Patent Convention, several states did not allow patent protection for pharmaceutical products. [read post]