Search for: "State v. Bright" Results 2401 - 2420 of 3,133
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Nov 2012, 5:34 pm
Even the Supreme Court has gotten in on the act with its 2011 decision in Brown v. [read post]
8 Mar 2010, 4:36 pm
United States (Copyright Litigation Blog) (Property, intangible)   US Trade Marks – Decisions Precedential No. 7: TTAB deems internet printouts admissible via notice of reliance: Safer, Inc v OMS Investments, Inc (TTABlog) TTAB vacates 2008 fraud ruling in Herbaceuticals, Inc v Xel Pharmaceuticals, Inc (TTABlog) TTAB affirms 2(d) refusal of CARMINE’S design for restaurant services in view of two other CARMINE’S designs: In re Carmine's Broadway… [read post]
8 Mar 2010, 4:36 pm
United States (Copyright Litigation Blog) (Property, intangible)   US Trade Marks – Decisions Precedential No. 7: TTAB deems internet printouts admissible via notice of reliance: Safer, Inc v OMS Investments, Inc (TTABlog) TTAB vacates 2008 fraud ruling in Herbaceuticals, Inc v Xel Pharmaceuticals, Inc (TTABlog) TTAB affirms 2(d) refusal of CARMINE’S design for restaurant services in view of two other CARMINE’S designs: In re Carmine's Broadway… [read post]
11 Oct 2019, 7:51 am by Bona Law PC
” The court added poetically that Lajoie “may not be the sun in the baseball firmament, but he is certainly a bright, particular star. [read post]
26 May 2008, 8:06 pm
The Court does note a series of decisions which run counter to the reasoning in United States v. [read post]
28 Apr 2011, 6:00 am by Bruce Nye
"  We're talking Starbucks Corporation v. [read post]
28 Mar 2012, 9:52 pm by Nicole Huberfeld
  The states are, after all, asking the Court to ‘fashion’ doctrine for them. [read post]
13 Feb 2008, 1:49 am
S138130, January 24, 2008), the state's high court affirmed a bright line test that employers need not accommodate the use of illegal drugs. [read post]
16 Jul 2024, 3:33 am by SHG
” The Supreme Court, in a unanimous decision, United States v. [read post]