Search for: "State v. Lord" Results 2401 - 2420 of 3,609
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Nov 2011, 6:58 am by NL
Mr Justice Eady's judgment contains a potted history of human rights and public law challenges to summary possession proceedings, from Kay v Lambeth to Manchester CC v Pinnock and Hounslow LBC v Powell. [read post]
21 Feb 2014, 6:19 am
In the famous House of Lords case, Hensher v Restawile [1976] AC 64, Lord Simon discusses this point, noting that even Morris himself “acknowledged that the machine could be useful in extinguishing all irksome and unintelligent labour, leaving us free to raise the standard of skill of hand and energy of mind of our workmen. [read post]
28 Dec 2017, 11:13 am by Eugene Volokh
The LORD is good and we will continue to serve HIM with all our heart.'" The court noted that a ban on threats of discrimination is constitutional: The Supreme Court's decision in Rumsfeld v. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 2:04 am by Madeleine Reardon, 1 KBW.
The Supreme Court’s decision in Re E can be seen in some ways as guiding interpretation of Article 13(b) of the Hague Convention ‘back on track’, following the decision of the ECHR last year in Neulinger and Shuruk v Switzerland [2011] 1 FLR 122. [read post]
31 Mar 2011, 5:04 am by INFORRM
The UK Secretary of State for Justice, Kenneth Clarke recently released his government’s Draft Defamation Bill. [read post]
17 Nov 2014, 3:34 am by Peter Mahler
Over 100 years ago, in Lord v Hull, 178 NY 9 [1904], the New York Court of Appeals — the state’s highest court — drew upon English common law to establish what has become a bedrock principle of American partnership law, that courts generally will not entertain lawsuits between partners except in the setting of a dissolution or final accounting. [read post]
7 Dec 2015, 7:37 am
  Years ago, when trade secret theft was mainly a local problem, state trade secrets law was adequate as the theft was between state borders. [read post]
5 Sep 2008, 3:16 pm
Part V concludes with reflections on the exemplary significance of the natural born citizen clause for constitutional theory.I highly recommend Sach's paper--which is very fine indeed. [read post]
27 Mar 2018, 11:39 am by Howard M. Wasserman
The first was the United States, which is composed of states united into one mass or body, although all agree that entry into the union does not deprive a state of its distinct and individual existence. [read post]
17 Feb 2016, 4:40 pm by INFORRM
Pastor McConnell gave evidence as to his background and stated he became a Christian at the age of 8 and had been a full time preacher for 60 years. [read post]
10 Oct 2015, 10:54 am by Schachtman
Reg. 4685 (Jan. 21, 2009). [6] See Burka v. [read post]
3 May 2010, 2:36 am by INFORRM
His submission, by David Pannick and David Sherborne,  sets out UK authority (such as the the Spycatcher case, Lord Woolf in the Flitcroft decision, the House of Lords decision in Cream Holdings v Banerjee, and the Court of Appeal in Douglas v Hello! [read post]
30 Jul 2014, 7:20 am by Heather Green, University of Aberdeen
This is only the third case to reach the Supreme Court involving the limits of the right to free elections in A3P1 (the first was R (Barclay & Ors) v Secretary of State for Justice [2009] UKSC 9, on election law on the island of Sark; the second was the unsuccessful challenge to the UK’s prisoner voting ban in  R (Chester) v Secretary of State for Justice and McGeoch v Lord President of the Council [2013] UKSC 63). [read post]
31 May 2015, 3:47 am
As Lord Nicholls of Birkenhead said in Sempra Metals v IRC [2007] UKHL 34; [2008] 1 AC 561 at [51]:  "Legal rules which are not soundly based resemble proverbial bad pennies: they turn up again and again. [read post]
21 Oct 2019, 12:15 am by INFORRM
On 24 October 2019 there will be an application in the case of Lord Sheikh v Associated Newspapers. [read post]
11 Nov 2023, 1:24 am by Tobias Lutzi
The court agreed with the corporate defendants, having applied the two-stage test set out by the House of Lords in Spiliada Maritime Corp v Cansulex Ltd. [read post]