Search for: "BRS "
Results 2421 - 2440
of 2,581
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Jun 2015, 5:56 am
See SG br., 2015 WL 2457643, at *9 (“California directly incorporates the federal new-drug application regulations”).Thus, as we explained in much greater detail in our earlier Athena post, the result was an injunction against selling an unapproved “drug,” even though the FDA had never determined that this product was a “drug” that required pre-marketing approval in the first place. [read post]
5 Jan 2015, 6:18 am
Dan Halperin filed a “putative class action” in federal court “against Affluent Ads, LLC, and International Web Services, LLC, the creator and distributor of Text Enhance, alleging violations of the “Computer Fraud and Abuse Act (`CFAA’), 18 U.S.C. [read post]
25 Mar 2016, 4:02 am
Br. 75, it is clear that finding and obtaining stand-alone contraceptive coverage on the Exchanges would be a substantial barrier for many women. [read post]
29 Jan 2018, 2:30 pm
WHY DOES IT MATTER WHETHER OR NOT STUDENT LOANS ARE CONSIDERED CONSUMER DEBTS? [read post]
9 Nov 2018, 11:34 am
As an attempt to meet this requirement, AMX attached to its arbitration demand an unsigned letter by Bradford Russell of BR Architects & Engineers. [read post]
23 Jul 2020, 4:00 am
The rapid emergence of COVID-19 creates new challenges for the nation’s patchwork of state run workplace benefit delivery systems. [read post]
9 Oct 2019, 8:13 pm
The Supreme Court heard oral argument yesterday morning in three cases concerning whether the provision in Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 making it unlawful for a covered employer to “discriminate against” an employee “because of such individual’s . . . sex” prohibits such an employer from firing an employee because he’s a gay man or because she's a transgender woman. [read post]
4 Feb 2015, 1:52 pm
In In re Cuozzo Speed Technologies, a split CAFC panel observedContrary to Cuozzo’s contention, we hold that we lackjurisdiction to review the PTO’s decision to institute IPR.We affirm the Board’s final determination, finding noerror in the Board’s claim construction under the broadestreasonable interpretation standard, the Board’s obviousnessdetermination, and the Board’s denial of Cuozzo’smotion to amend.The legal matter involved an inter partes review… [read post]
12 Aug 2021, 2:06 pm
Panel 24 – Remedies: Thomas F. [read post]
2 Oct 2019, 12:12 pm
The D.C. [read post]
5 May 2017, 11:24 am
The CAFC decision related to cases merged from different patent challenges at the PTAB level:This appeal arises from two inter partes reexaminationsand an ex parte reexamination of U.S. [read post]
31 Dec 2017, 10:36 am
The conduct would be no more becoming a member of the Bar of this Court because the government’s statements to counsel were accurate when made, see Br. in Opp. 23; the government never “forsw[o]r[e]” a different course of action, see id. at 25; and nothing prevented counsel from extracting more explicit commitments rather than taking the government at its word, see id. at 29. [read post]
11 Jan 2016, 2:42 pm
Given the obviousness of this Rule 41 defect on the record before us, the Government's belated concession is a prudent one.See Government Br. at 21 n. 4 (explaining that the district court found Warrant 2 `was so facially deficient that the good-faith exception should not apply’ and expressly not appealing that ruling). [read post]
17 Oct 2016, 7:03 am
“[E]ven if a consumer’s initial-interest confusion only persists long enough to lead him to the homepage, then Defendant has ‘br[ought] the patrons in the door. . . . [read post]
20 Jun 2017, 3:18 pm
The Government did not argue that it could “ban,” “restrict,” “punish” or “suppress” disparaging marks: Indeed, it acknowledged that that would be unconstitutional—that its rationales “would be . . . constitutionally insufficient . . . for a ban on the use of disparaging language” (Reply Br. 8).The heart of the government’s case was, instead, that the PTO’s refusal to register “Slants” was… [read post]
2 Jan 2019, 2:53 pm
Julio Fernando Injoque Cuidado con perder la brújula, amigo Anderson. [read post]
26 Oct 2021, 6:53 am
We are happy to report that Nature magazine has a timely book review by Heidi Ledford, reviewing The Genome Defense: Inside the Epic Legal Battle to Determine Who Owns Your DNA, a book authored by Jorge L. [read post]
17 Aug 2018, 10:03 am
Tips For Safe Loading in a Forklift I’m Ed Smith, a Sacramento personal injury lawyer. [read post]
14 Dec 2017, 2:27 pm
Typical Causes of Motorcycle Accidents I’m Ed Smith, a Motorcycle Accident Attorney in Antioch. [read post]
25 Dec 2017, 4:03 am
Lane Splitting Motorcycle Accidents I’m Ed Smith, a Motorcycle Accident Attorney in Napa. [read post]
