Search for: "California v. Texas" Results 2421 - 2440 of 4,429
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Oct 2012, 1:08 pm by Richard Renner
Oracle Corporation Case number: 12-cv-4310 (United States District Court for the Northern District of California) Case filed: August 16, 2012 Qualifying Judgment/Order: August 27, 2012 10/02/2012 12/31/2012 2012-102 SEC v. [read post]
26 May 2022, 8:45 am by John Elwood
Texas, 21-6001Issues: (1) Whether, on remand, the Texas court rejected the Supreme Court’s conclusions in Andrus v. [read post]
3 Feb 2017, 12:02 pm by Andrew Kent
Bray notes that liberal attorneys general and other plaintiffs tended to challenge Bush administration policies in the more liberal federal courts of California, while conservative litigants often chose to challenge Obama policies before the more conservative district and circuit judges of Texas. [read post]
14 Sep 2015, 7:34 am by Amy Howe
” At the Appellate Practice Blog of the International Municipal Lawyers Association, Lisa Soronen previews Franchise Tax Board of California v. [read post]
7 Feb 2012, 10:06 am by Lyle Denniston
  Kennedy was also the author of a broader gay rights ruling in 2003, Lawrence v. [read post]
15 Jun 2011, 9:12 pm by David Kemp
Opponents of DOMA point to the Supreme Court’s decision in Lawrence v. [read post]
15 Jun 2011, 9:12 pm by David Kemp
Opponents of DOMA point to the Supreme Court’s decision in Lawrence v. [read post]
22 Jul 2020, 5:09 am by James Romoser
” In Health Affairs, Katie Keith analyzes the various health care cases that the Supreme Court decided in the 2019-20 term and previews next steps in California v. [read post]
30 Oct 2020, 11:41 am by NCC Staff
Republicans Don’t Know What to Do with Their Bad-Faith ACA Case By Nicholas Bagley, Professor of Law, University of Michigan Law School Nicholas Bagley compares the vigorous support the first Supreme Court case against the Affordable Care Act garnered from the conservative establishment and Republican party against the far weaker backing for the current case, California v. [read post]