Search for: "Crawford"
Results 2421 - 2440
of 6,150
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Dec 2011, 3:41 am
Crager, the Supreme Court reversed, holding that “results of scientific tests are not testimonial under Crawford. [read post]
7 Dec 2011, 8:52 pm
Third, bear in mind an important point made by Crawford: Although various doctrines in the 18th century allowed certain types of what we would now characterize as hearsay, there was not a reliability-based set of exceptions for testimonial statements; the dying declaration exception (which I think should be justified on other grounds) was, as Crawford said, sui generis. [read post]
7 Dec 2011, 1:50 pm
For more information about the Canadian Journal of Women and the Law or for submissions information, please contact: Canadian Journal of Women and the Law University of Toronto Press – Journals Division 5201 Dufferin Street, Toronto, ON Canada M3H 5T8 Tel: (416)667-7810 Fax: (416)667-7881 Email: journals@utpress.utoronto.ca Website: www.utpjournals.com -Bridget Crawford [read post]
7 Dec 2011, 11:01 am
Indeed, it’s a worse place to draw the Crawford line than Melendez-Diaz would have been because the (possibly unreliable, untested) testimonial hearsay is hidden behind the veil of the testifying expert’s testimony. [read post]
7 Dec 2011, 7:55 am
Supreme Court’s reasoning in Crawford upholding Indiana’s photo-ID requirement on the ground that “the more expansive and concrete protection of the right to vote under the Missouri Constitution [confers] greater protection than its federal counterpart. [read post]
7 Dec 2011, 2:00 am
CorVel Corporation Costco Wholesale Coventry Workers' Comp Services Crawford & Company Gallagher Bassett Services, Inc. [read post]
6 Dec 2011, 2:19 pm
***One could say with a fair degree of confidence that the five Justices who started the revolution in the Court’s Confrontation Clause jurisprudence in Crawford v. [read post]
6 Dec 2011, 1:07 pm
” The Court held in Crawford v. [read post]
6 Dec 2011, 5:16 am
It is easy to teach them that, after Crawford, testimonial statements are inadmissible absent confrontation. [read post]
5 Dec 2011, 12:42 pm
” One could say with a fair degree of confidence that the five Justices who started the revolution in the Court’s Confrontation Clause jurisprudence in Crawford v. [read post]
5 Dec 2011, 12:27 pm
I am going to try over the next several days to post (rather belatedly) a series of entries analyzing some of the arguments made by the state-side briefs in Williams. [read post]
5 Dec 2011, 6:47 am
The Tennessee Court of Appeals issued an opinion on its relatively new certificate of merit rule in Crawford v. [read post]
5 Dec 2011, 4:44 am
Image via Wikipedia These are some of the things I've been tweeting about today: susan crawford on "The New Digital Divide" http://pjblack.me/w1emCV i only just saw this news: "Google's Chrome Surpasses Firefox as No. 2 Browser to Internet Explorer" http://pjblack.me/vSPOFp @derekbartels have you seen this? [read post]
5 Dec 2011, 3:45 am
Illinois, the Court will consider whether there’s a Crawford violation when one witness testifies about the results of DNA testing performed by a different analyst. [read post]
5 Dec 2011, 3:00 am
The TTI team found that twice that many, or 12 percent, were talking on the phone while driving through the DFW Connector, Crawford said. [read post]
4 Dec 2011, 8:33 pm
Professor Friedman draws attention to several articles: Here is a link to a piece on it by Erwin Chemerinsky, and here is a link to an Op Ed piece in the New York Times by Jeff Fisher (counsel for Crawford). [read post]
4 Dec 2011, 5:56 am
Jan Crawford on Herman Cain leaving the Presidential race. [read post]
3 Dec 2011, 7:31 pm
Illinois, cert granted at the end of June, argument before the berobed ones in DC on Tuesday.It's another in the line of cases that began with Crawford v. [read post]
3 Dec 2011, 5:21 am
Illinois, on for argument before the Supremes next Tuesday. again challenging the Crawford rule that the prosecution has to produce the actual lab tech who produced the damning lab report rather than mailing it in. [read post]
2 Dec 2011, 7:54 am
In 2004 in Crawford v. [read post]
