Search for: "Defendants A-F" Results 2421 - 2440 of 29,812
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Jun 2022, 10:03 am by Robert B. Milligan
Thanoo, 999 F.3d 892 (3d Cir. 2021), the Third Circuit addressed the pleading requirements to assert a claim under Defend Trade Secrets Act (“DTSA”). [read post]
3 Jun 2022, 8:46 am by John Jascob
”The Chamber urged the Ninth Circuit to grant review under Rule 23(f) because the case presents an important question of law. [read post]
City of Chicago, —F.4th—, 2022 WL 1548176 (May 17, 2022), the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals recently struck down one litigant’s attempt to employ a “stealth” class action. [read post]
3 Jun 2022, 4:12 am by R. David Donoghue
Pritzker, 973 F.3d 760, 762 (7th Cir. 2020): It explained that a “possibility of success is not enough” and “[n]either is a better than negligible chance[,]” but the moving party “need not show that it definitely will win the case. [read post]
2 Jun 2022, 4:10 am by Apostolos Anthimos
Nikolaos Klamaris on the international jurisdiction of the Court of Piraeus (Department of Maritime Disputes) on a tort, committed in Piraeus by defendants based in Asia, while in the column L&F Praxis, the Judge Mr. [read post]
1 Jun 2022, 4:30 am by Eric B. Meyer
In this case, the court concluded that the defendant provided all the leave to which the plaintiff was entitled (and then some) through mid-December. [read post]
31 May 2022, 1:55 pm by JURIST Staff
” In response, the Ukrainian side famously said: “Russian warship, go f*ck yourself! [read post]
31 May 2022, 12:39 pm by Ana Popovich
Because only “[f]our manufacturers — Abbott, Mead Johnson Nutrition, Nestle USA and Perrigo — control 90% of the infant formula market in the U.S. [read post]
31 May 2022, 6:13 am by The Law Offices of John Day, P.C.
The Court explained that “[i]f VUMC would have filed a Rule 12.02 motion…, its motion inevitably would have been converted into a motion for summary judgment” because of the submission of the affidavit, so defendant’s choice to file a motion for summary judgment did not waive its defense. [read post]
27 May 2022, 10:12 am by Eugene Volokh
" [The problem here was that Heard wasn't a party to the English case—The Sun was—and the court held that they weren't sufficiently "in privity" to be treated as essentially the same party: -EV] [F]or privity to exist, Defendant's interest in the case must be so identical with The Sun's interest such that The Sun's representation of its interest is also a representation of Defendant's legal right. [read post]