Search for: "Does 1-29" Results 2421 - 2440 of 12,789
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Mar 2020, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
(p. 29) There is also a risk that the government will seek to control and censor private speakers by labeling contested speech governmental. [read post]
5 Nov 2010, 12:52 pm by Joseph C. McDaniel
Now AVVO.com does more: in fact, it is responsible for the greatest advance in medicine in the United States since penicillin. [read post]
6 May 2017, 12:00 am by Robert L. Mues
How Does The New Shared Parenting Law Signed In Kentucky Impact Ohio? [read post]
28 Feb 2012, 2:42 pm by W. Scott Blackmer
Google's new cross-service privacy policy is supposed to come into effect on March 1. [read post]
17 Jul 2012, 5:01 pm by oliver
Opponent 5’s tests of 22 December 2008 show that the addition of a dispersant (a) to oleic acid does not lead to any improvement in wear scar after 28/29 days at -30°C and that the addition of dispersant (a) to TOFA b after 27 days at -30ºC even leads to an increase in wear scar. [read post]
9 Jun 2011, 7:12 am by emagraken
It should be noted that in this case, the demand (and indeed order sought) is for production of additional documents, not simply a listing of such documents: seeRules 7-1(1) (d), (e) and (f). [29] The court retains the discretion under Rule 7-1(14) to order that the party not produce the requested list or documents. [read post]
22 Apr 2008, 8:40 am
Searches of the following specific items have been upheld without particularized suspicion: (1) the contents of a traveler's briefcase and luggage, United States v. [read post]
2 Feb 2016, 12:55 pm by Schachtman
(Jan. 29, 2016). [5] Douglas L. [read post]
11 Aug 2017, 9:09 am by Rachel Sandler
§102(a)(1) does not cover non-public uses or non-public sales,” and “otherwise available to the public” is an added “modifier . . . restrict[ing] the meaning of the preceding clause. [read post]
1 Jul 2020, 4:05 am
On Monday, June 29, Chief Judge Colleen McMahon, of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, issued a 37-page opinion which threw out a lawsuit filed by three landlords who alleged that New York State’s moratorium -- on evicting tenants facing financial hardship as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic, as well as the directive permitting tenants to have their landlords apply their security deposits to any outstanding rent -- was constitutionally… [read post]