Search for: "In Re Kennedy" Results 2421 - 2440 of 4,536
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Apr 2012, 12:01 am by George M. Wallace
If it proves to be real—which I suppose is possible in this ever-changing world in which we're living—you'll all know about it next week, and I will confess my doubts were misplaced.] [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 12:01 am by George M. Wallace
If it proves to be real—which I suppose is possible in this ever-changing world in which we're living—you'll all know about it next week, and I will confess my doubts were misplaced.] [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 12:01 am by George M. Wallace
If it proves to be real—which I suppose is possible in this ever-changing world in which we're living—you'll all know about it next week, and I will confess my doubts were misplaced.] [read post]
1 Apr 2012, 7:46 pm by Dave Hoffman
Like Lincoln, Kennedy wasn’t elected by the majority of voters. [read post]
1 Apr 2012, 3:59 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
", Morley Safer re-visits a story from 20 years ago. [read post]
31 Mar 2012, 1:48 pm by lawmrh
" Indeed, post-hearings, things are already so worrisome for Progressives that not only are they running around trying to simultaneously grab all four cheeks - - - but they're also trying to grab each other's. [read post]
30 Mar 2012, 3:03 pm
Then we go through a period where the justices are drafting opinions, they're exchanging thoughts, and the ultimate result probably will be in June. [read post]
30 Mar 2012, 10:11 am
Just because someone loves liberty doesn't mean they're going to love everything you slap a "liberty" label on! [read post]
30 Mar 2012, 7:07 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
Roberts, Jr., "Oral Advocacy and Re-emergence of a Supreme Court Bar," 30 Journal of Supreme Court History 68 (2005).The paper speaks of a "realistic theory":The realistic theory is that judges usually make up their mind before oral argument. [read post]
29 Mar 2012, 5:00 pm by Amy Howe
”  And Justice Kennedy wondered aloud why the expansion provision really infringed on states’ rights if – as Clement appeared to agree – the federal government could instead just decide to skip the partnership with the states and provide health care to the poor itself. [read post]
29 Mar 2012, 1:03 pm by Deborah Pearlstein
That is to say, they’re quite right, but you don’t need that much insurance market theory to understand why. [read post]
29 Mar 2012, 8:43 am
And Justice Kennedy, a little more mixed, but he said, for example, in challenging the individual mandate argument. [read post]
29 Mar 2012, 3:45 am by Russ Bensing
  Instead of trying to determine what a jury would have done, we’re trying to determine what the defendant would’ve done. [read post]
28 Mar 2012, 8:25 pm
" Clement hits Kennedy with a word Kennedy has used himself in federalism cases. [read post]
28 Mar 2012, 5:32 pm by admin
Also still available, The Lawyer’s Guide to Collaboration Tools and Technologies: Smart Ways to Work Together, by Dennis Kennedy and Tom Mighell. [read post]