Search for: "In re Davis" Results 2421 - 2440 of 4,997
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Aug 2017, 3:21 pm
 Davis, 275 F.3d 849, 867 (9th Cir. 2001), abrogated on other grounds by Johnson v. [read post]
22 May 2013, 1:40 pm
“In order to know whether the programs you put in place are working, you have to know where you started,” he says.Not all 16 firms have conducted surveys to gather diversity statistics, but most said they’re open to the idea.They say not only will diversity initiatives benefit the firms, but clients as well. [read post]
24 May 2015, 2:09 pm
Slip Op. 3990 In re Proceeding, etc., V.C., Petitioner-Appellant, v. [read post]
2 Mar 2015, 7:17 am by Rachel, Law Clerk and Office Manager
Here are the leading legal headlines from Wise Law on Twitter:Hill media fight over harassment policy, some say it could destroy Parliamentary Press GalleryNon-Competition Provision Results In Increased Notice Period By BC CourtConrad Black permanently banned as director or officer of any Ontario public company 100 academics urge major changes to ‘dangerous’ anti-terrorism billUS Navy judge lifts order banning female guards from touching Guantanamo interneesCanada’s… [read post]
25 Apr 2013, 3:06 am by Andrew Trask
One plaintiff attorney-scholar group (Joshua Davis, Eric Cramer, and Caitlin May) says "yes." [read post]
20 Aug 2013, 9:21 am
“That means meaningful metrics that are measured, of relevance to stakeholders and assurance of the numbers so you’re not gaming the metrics. [read post]
6 May 2013, 8:06 am
Luna-Acosta, Tenth Circuit: Appellant pled guilty to illegal re-entry into the United States. [read post]
22 Oct 2016, 7:04 am by Zachary Burdette
Katherine Maddox Davis delved into the ICJ’s decision that the court lacks jurisdiction to decide on issues of nuclear disarmament. [read post]
10 May 2020, 7:48 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
They’re touted by leaders and people in positions of power. [read post]
25 Jul 2020, 7:29 am by Andrew Crespo
“You’re Probably Talking About the Van” When Cline stepped up to the microphone, he started to address the reporter’s question about probable cause by saying, “you’re probably talking about the van. [read post]
21 Aug 2009, 3:41 am
  No, you’re not on it. [read post]
2 Oct 2014, 5:55 am by SHG
If you’re a prosecutor and agents ask for your legal advice, you will know that by approving a questionable practice, the mere fact of your approval becomes an argument against the exclusionary rule applying if you turn out to be wrong. [read post]
26 Nov 2007, 7:15 am
Even so McKinney contradicted Davis, claiming GAIN had never been informed. [read post]