Search for: "John A Stephens" Results 2421 - 2440 of 6,948
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Aug 2017, 1:43 pm by Linda Holmes
The book is: Three Centuries of Shaping American Law by Stephen B. [read post]
2 Aug 2017, 1:15 pm
Comedians like John Oliver and Stephen Colbert don’t just have large audiences — they have large audiences that care about the important issues facing our country. [read post]
31 Jul 2017, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
Louis University Law Journal, Vol. 60, p. 601, 2016).John D. [read post]
29 Jul 2017, 2:06 pm by John E. Bies
Attorney for the Northern District of Texas, currently John R. [read post]
29 Jul 2017, 12:34 pm by Schachtman
Cranor, Toxic Torts: Science, Law, and the Possibility of Justice 146 (2d ed. 2016) (citing and selectively quoting from Schachtman, “WOE-fully Inadequate Methodology – An Ipse Dixit By Another Name” (May 1, 2012)). 4 See Charles Menzie, Miranda Hope Henning, Jerome Cura, Kenneth Finkelstein, Jack Gentile, James Maughan, David Mitchell, Stephen Petron, Bonnie Potocki, Susan Svirsky & Patti Tyler, “A weight-of-evidence approach for evaluating ecological… [read post]
27 Jul 2017, 7:49 am by Scott Bomboy
“If a Senate recess is so short that it does not require the consent of the House, it is too short to trigger the Recess Appointments Clause,” said Justice Stephen Breyer in the Court’s opinion in Noel Canning. [read post]
25 Jul 2017, 1:17 pm by Kenneth Anderson
Arab Bank, PLC case, is how much Chief Justice John Roberts’ majority opinion and Justice Stephen Breyer’s concurrence (substantially a dissent) share in the way of two key background assumptions, one about politics and the other about law. [read post]
25 Jul 2017, 12:25 pm by Guest Blogger
Calvin TerBeekAfter the shock of President Trump’s election, some political scientists and legal scholars turned to Stephen Skowronek’s theory of political time to understand Trump’s place in presidential history. [read post]
24 Jul 2017, 9:30 pm by Lisa P. Ramsey
In the plurality opinion, Justice Samuel Alito—joined by Chief Justice John Roberts and Justices Clarence Thomas and Stephen Breyer—concluded that the Court did not need to decide whether the law was subject to the more relaxed “intermediate scrutiny” test used for regulations of commercial expression or the “heightened scrutiny” test required “whenever the government creates a regulation of speech because of disagreement with the message… [read post]
24 Jul 2017, 10:24 am
(Supreme Court of Ohio Sides with Taxpayers in Two Recent Real Estate Taxation Decisions)By: Stephen D. [read post]
24 Jul 2017, 10:24 am
(Supreme Court of Ohio Sides with Taxpayers in Two Recent Real Estate Taxation Decisions)By: Stephen D. [read post]
24 Jul 2017, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
Darnell Weeden, Marriage Equality Laws Are a Threat to Religious Liberty, 41 Southern Illinois University Law Journal 211-236 (2017).Stephen L. [read post]
18 Jul 2017, 1:59 pm by Stephen Neyman, P.C.
One class of violators (Johns) situated similarly to the other class of offenders (prostitutes) should not be given disparate treatment. [read post]
18 Jul 2017, 1:59 pm by Stephen Neyman, P.C.
One class of violators (Johns) situated similarly to the other class of offenders (prostitutes) should not be given disparate treatment. [read post]
14 Jul 2017, 6:19 am
Yavitz, Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz, on Saturday, July 8, 2017 Tags: Anti-corruption, Asset-backed securities, Barclays Capital, Corporate crime, Corporate fraud, DOJ, International governance, Mortgage lending, Qatar, Securities enforcement, UK 2017 Proxy Season Review Posted by Mark Manoff and Stephen W. [read post]
12 Jul 2017, 6:30 am by Mitra Sharafi
The book also explores several common themes which are fundamental to the development of the law of contract: for instance, the influence of commercial expectations, appeals to 'reason' and the significance of particular judicial ideologies and techniques.TOC after the jump.1 Coggs v Barnard (1703) DAVID IBBETSON2 Pillans v Van Mierop (1765) GERARD MCMEEL3 Carter v Boehm (1766) STEPHEN WATTERSON4 Da Costa v Jones (1778) WARREN SWAIN5 Hochster v De La Tour (1853) PAUL MITCHELL6… [read post]
11 Jul 2017, 2:55 am by NCC Staff
Randolph Perhaps the oddest duel was between Secretary of State Henry Clay and Senator John Randolph in 1826. [read post]