Search for: "Lilly"
Results 2421 - 2440
of 3,231
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Apr 2019, 5:29 am
This focused on the three-step test of the Eli Lilly v Actavis UK Supreme Court decision and the subsequent UK cases applying that test. [read post]
17 Jan 2019, 11:09 pm
In many circumstances, she had to make a decision because the law required it but it was not necessarily the best thing for the family.Inevitably there was some discussion about the implications of Actavis v Eli Lilly [2017] UKSC 48. [read post]
26 Apr 2015, 6:14 pm
As an example if one considers how inventive step was assessed in Teva UK Limited & Teva Pharmaceuticals Limited v Leo Pharma A/S & Leo Laboratories Limited [2014] EWHC 3096 (Pat) (see Katpost here) one sees that for a pharmaceutical formulation the following criteria may be relevant:* obvious to try * reasonable expectation of success * prejudice * inventive selection * the Technograph test (Technograph v Mills & Rockley [1972] RPC 346) * synergyMr Justice Birss… [read post]
8 Sep 2015, 9:49 am
Zacarias (2015) 237 Cal.App.4th 16, the Court of Appeal for the Second Appellate District held that the hardship that a trespasser would have in removing her portable patio furniture from a neighbor’s property would not be “greatly disproportionate” to the hardship on the neighbor in losing the trespassed-upon portion of that neighbor’s property occupied by the furniture, and so the trespasser was not entitled to an equitable easement to maintain that furniture on the… [read post]
17 Oct 2017, 6:09 pm
The panel members were Mattias Zigann, the presiding judge of the Munich Regional Court, Philip Kerr of Allens Linklaters and Larry Welch, the Senior Director, and Assistant General Patent Counsel at Eli Lilly and Company.Mr Ludwig explained that the question of what relief was appropriate had been highlighted by the very recent decision of the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit in AMGEN INC & ors v. [read post]
18 May 2017, 11:01 am
This argument was effectively rebutted by Stuart Lilly, Biscayne Bay pilot and past president of the Florida Harbor Pilots Association, who explained the difficulty of piloting the increasingly wide and deeper post-Panamax ships in and out of the narrow port of Miami channel which has not been widened since 1968. [read post]
16 Mar 2020, 9:12 am
" Eli Lilly & Co. v. [read post]
13 Jun 2017, 2:33 am
Marks misleading the public on the paternity of copyright works are fraudulent - say French Supreme CourtGuest Kat Mathilde Pavis reviews the French case regarding the word mark “Bébé Lilly”, which extended trade mark protection to the bond existing between an author and his/her work. [read post]
21 Feb 2018, 1:48 am
PatentsIn a two-part report, the AmeriKat exfoliates the decision in L'Oreal v RN Ventures [2018] EWHC 173, in which Mr Justice Carr bristles with warnings on Actavis v Lilly claim interpretation, equivalents and prosecution history (Part I and Part II)Can Wenzhou and cigarette lighters tell us something about why there are IP rights? [read post]
27 Jul 2015, 9:35 am
| The IPKat and his friends | GO Outdoors Ltd v Skechers USA Inc II | Allfiled UK Ltd v Eltis & 16 Others | OAEE 'victims' mark in Greece | Icons, flags and the Hazzards of intellectual property toxicity | Why Finland is not Silicon Valley | The Sofa Workshop Ltd v Sofaworks Ltd | The Ukulele Orchestra of Great Britain v Clausen & Another (t/a the United Kingdom Ukulele Orchestra) | Sony/ATV Music Publishing LLC & Another v WPMC Ltd… [read post]
4 Apr 2016, 11:21 am
| Actavis v Lilly | EU public consultation on neighbouring rights | Life as an IP Lawyer in San Francisco | Copyright in chess games | Trade surplus and IP | Fujifilm Kyowa Biologics v AbbVie Biotechnology. [read post]
30 Apr 2017, 4:30 am
| Tune in LIVE for tomorrow's Eli Lilly v Actavis Supreme Court showdown | French court rules that resale right royalty must be only paid by sellersNever Too Late 142 [week ending on Sunday 2 April] | Conference report: Online platforms and intermediaries in copyright law | Fun with Fujifilm Declarations! [read post]
15 Oct 2017, 7:59 pm
Nonetheless, the requirement of plausibility is still a “very low” threshold and different to the requirement of “fair expectation of success” in the inventive step inquiry - citing Actavis v Lilly[2015]. [read post]
13 Jul 2020, 1:13 pm
Obviousness-Type Double Patenting As explained in Eli Lilly and Co. v. [read post]
9 May 2017, 12:59 pm
Here's my checklist|Fujifilm v AbbVie: practice, procedure and policy analysis|Overturning a trade mark opposition decision - Part 2 - SOULUXE - likelihood of confusion|Overturning a trade mark opposition decision - Part 1 - IWATCH, descriptive goods and acquired distinctivenessNever Too Late 143 [week ending on Sunday 9 April] |French court rules that resale right royalty must be only paid by sellers I Tune in LIVE for tomorrow's Eli Lilly v Actavis Supreme Court… [read post]
8 Mar 2023, 2:51 pm
Eli Lilly & Co., 598 F.3d 1336, 1350−52 (Fed. [read post]
12 Mar 2014, 1:52 pm
Eli Lilly & Co., 2014 WL 904202 (8th Cir. [read post]
22 May 2015, 7:18 am
Id. at **6-7 (quoting Lilly v. [read post]
28 Jun 2013, 5:02 am
Eli Lilly & Co., No. 2:12-cv-09366-SVW-MAN, slip op. [read post]
25 Jan 2016, 1:31 am
Never too late 78 [week ending on Sunday 27 December] – Zer-sum claim and lookalike products | 2015 Copyright Awards | Santa Claus and Section 52 | Jani writes on Dallas Buyers Club LLC v iiNet Limited | IP Hairballs | Actavis v Eli Lilly | Power outage at USPTO | Santa's GC resigns | Pet rock and IP. [read post]
