Search for: "London v. State" Results 2421 - 2440 of 3,591
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Jun 2011, 2:15 am by INFORRM
   In the case of Barach v University of New South Wales  [2011] NSWSC 431 the Supreme Court of New South Wales gave the claimant permission to serve libel proceedings on a defendant in the United States. [read post]
18 Oct 2018, 6:50 am by Shana Tabak
Department of Defense Rosalyn Higgins, Professor, London School of Economics Madeleine E. [read post]
11 Nov 2012, 4:15 pm by NL
Erith is in the London Borough of Bexleyheath and is about 18 miles by road from this office. [read post]
11 Nov 2012, 4:15 pm by NL
Erith is in the London Borough of Bexleyheath and is about 18 miles by road from this office. [read post]
31 May 2010, 10:10 pm by INFORRM
This may significantly impact on privacy laws across all Europe’s contracting states. [read post]
1 Feb 2015, 4:06 pm by INFORRM
Palmer used twitter to announce his plan to sue after the state election. [read post]
13 May 2024, 12:57 am by INFORRM
On Thursday 16 May 2024 there will be an injunction application in the privacy case of Department for Education v Hercules KB-2024-000389 Reserved judgements Harrison v Cameron, heard 26 March 2024 (Steyn J) BW Legal Services Limited v Trustpilot,  heard 7 March 2024 (HHJ Lewis) Unity Plus Healthcare Limited v Clay and others,  heard 1 March 2024 (HHJ Lewis) Vince v Associated Newspapers, heard 19 February 2024 (HHJ Lewis) Pacini… [read post]
14 Jan 2008, 3:24 am
Attorney for the State: Joby Jerrells, Indianapolis, IN. 9:45 AM - Brenwick Associates, LLC v. [read post]
31 Mar 2014, 11:34 am
In Michael Toth v Emirates [2011] EWPCC 18, 13 June 2011.) [read post]
18 Sep 2019, 2:07 pm
For example, if Brexit happens, London Fashion Week, the 2019 edition of which just concluded, might lose shows to Paris or Milan.Counsel for BHTB raised an interesting point: is the “Fortress Europe” approach that an ‘EU disclosure only’ approach to qualification for UCD protection consistent with the requirement under Article 3 of TRIPS that signatory states do not treat their own nationals any more favourably than nationals of another signatory… [read post]
4 Apr 2016, 3:17 am
 Besides the example of the US (where personality rights are a matter of state law, rather than federal law) in the UK, for instance, there is no such thing as image rights. [read post]