Search for: "Lord v. State" Results 2421 - 2440 of 4,051
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 May 2012, 3:05 am by New Books Script
. : Continuing Professional Development, Law Society of Upper Canada, 2012 1 v. [read post]
6 May 2012, 2:41 am by INFORRM
David Richards J held that this would therefore have involved a significant departures from two fundamental common law principles: first, the principle of open justice requires that trials are conducted in public; and, second, the principle of natural justice includes the right of a party to know the case against him and the evidence on which it is based (relying on Al Rawi v The Security Service [2011] UKSC 34 (13 July 2011) [10]-[13] (Lord Dyson); and later, in respect of open… [read post]
4 May 2012, 5:46 pm by INFORRM
The Upper Tribunal has handed down judgment in the case of Raed Mahajna v Secretary of State for the Home Department IA/21/21631/2011. [read post]
3 May 2012, 2:28 pm by Leanne Buckley-Thomson
Mr Justice Eder held that the correct approach was that the present legislation is presumed valid but, as stated by Lord Goff in Kirklees BC v Wickes Building Supplies Ltd [1993] AC 227, the existence of the alleged defence is to be taken into account in the exercise of the court’s discretion [paragraph 78]. [read post]
2 May 2012, 2:18 pm by Karwan Eskerie
R (on the application of AM) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2012] EWCA Civ 521 - Read judgment Whether expert evidence relied upon by an asylum seeker amounted to “independent evidence” of torture was the key issue before the Court of Appeal in this case . [read post]
2 May 2012, 12:27 am by Shaheen Rahman
Lord Justice Davis observed: The importance of complying with s.149 is not to be understated. [read post]
1 May 2012, 6:06 am by Mandelman
  Patricia’s daughter continues in her declaration to state what anyone would have to agree is the obvious. [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 4:25 am by Laura Sandwell, Matrix.
Secretary of State for the Home Department v Munir and anor, heard 24 – 27 April 2012. [read post]
26 Apr 2012, 12:58 pm by Matthew Flinn
Raed Mahajna v Secretary of State for the Home Department IA/21/21631/2011 – read judgment 1 Crown Office Row’s Neil Sheldon appeared for the Secretary of State in this case. [read post]
25 Apr 2012, 5:13 pm by INFORRM
The Court’s reasoning Silber J considered the case of  R (Animal Defenders International) v Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport [2008] UKHL 15 and concluded that even though that case is awaiting a ruling from the Grand Chamber in Strasbourg, he was bound by the House of Lords’ ruling that the prohibitions on political advertising contained in sections 319 and 321 of the 2003 Act were justified as being necessary in a democratic society… [read post]
25 Apr 2012, 1:22 pm by Margaret Wood
  It is this claim about which Henry V is seeking advice at the beginning of play: “My learned lord, we pray you to proceed,/ [...] [read post]
24 Apr 2012, 8:31 am by Rosalind English
London Christian Radio Ltd and Anor v Radio Advertising Clearance Centre (RACC) and Secretary of State for Culture – read judgment The High Court has upheld the refusal of the broadcasting regulator to clear an advertisement for transmission on the grounds that it offended the prohibition on political advertising. [read post]
24 Apr 2012, 5:20 am by INFORRM
The unusual situation of a judge in a civil case deciding whether a party is guilty of murder has arisen before: in Halford v Brookes ([1992] P.I.Q.R. [read post]