Search for: "NEW JERSEY v. UNITED STATES" Results 2421 - 2440 of 3,521
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Oct 2012, 7:44 am by John Elwood
United States, 12-5271, for yesterday’s grant in McQuiggin v. [read post]
1 Aug 2011, 4:39 am by Jeff Marshall
  Although the case is non-precedential and arises out of New Jersey, it does interpret Federal law and could have a persuasive impact on other states, including Pennsylvania. [read post]
26 May 2020, 7:55 am by Dan Bressler
United States, in which the IRS used a ‘John Doe’ summons that sought the identity of clients for whom the law firm had performed certain work. [read post]
26 Jan 2017, 9:47 pm by Patricia Salkin
Accordingly, the Court held that the challenged provisions of the ordinance were unconstitutionally vague under the United States and New Jersey Constitutions, as applied to “churches. [read post]
8 May 2019, 12:30 pm
United States, winning a decision from the Inter-American Court of Human Rights holding that the United States violated international human rights law for failing to respond adequately to gender-based violence. [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 3:01 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
  After respondent repeatedly failed to make payments required under the agreement, the federal court modified its order and imposed various restrictions on respondent, inter alia, limiting his business and personal expenditures and generally confining his personal travel to the City of New York and his business travel to New York State and New Jersey (Baker v Dorfman, 2006 WL 988756)[SD NY 2006]. [read post]
7 Jul 2016, 8:02 am by Jon Gelman
 In this appeal, the Court considers the following question of law certified by the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit:  Does the premises liability rule set forth in Olivo v. [read post]
27 Apr 2018, 5:52 am by Thaddeus Hoffmeister
  New Batson Rule in Washington The Washington State Courts adopted a new rule to supplement Batson v. [read post]
24 May 2007, 10:40 am
Zimmmer, Inc., 927 F.2d 124, 129 (2d Cir. 1991) (applying New York law); Phelps v. [read post]
30 Sep 2015, 5:07 am by Mary Jane Wilmoth
Frank TamayoCase Number: 14-cv-05844 (United States District Court for the District of New Jersey)Case Filed: September 19, 2014Qualifying Judgment/Order: July 14, 2015 8/31/2015 11/29/2015 2015-77 SEC v. [read post]
20 Apr 2015, 6:30 am
Yücel is a citizen of Sweden . . ., and was extradited from the Republic of Moldova to the United States in May 2014.U.S. v. [read post]
7 Jun 2017, 4:26 am by Edith Roberts
United States, the justices ruled 8-0 that co-conspirators who do not benefit personally from illegal proceeds cannot  be ordered to forfeit property. [read post]
5 Sep 2012, 8:11 am
Reilly and Pluemacher filed a claim in the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey on behalf of all of Ceridian's potential victims. [read post]
20 Oct 2011, 11:39 am by Kiran Bhat
Finally, Monday’s grant of certiorari in United States v. [read post]
29 Oct 2019, 7:20 am by Joel Goldstein
The United States asserted the fund’s subrogated rights and the suits were consolidated. [read post]
7 Sep 2017, 7:09 am by Eliana Baer
Indeed, the right against self-incrimination, although not protected by the New Jersey constitution, is deeply rooted in our jurisprudence and codified in N.J.S.A. 2A:84A-19, which states that every person in New Jersey “has a right to refuse to disclose in an action…any matter that will incriminate him or expose him to penalty…” Both the United States Supreme Court and our New Jersey courts… [read post]