Search for: "Paras v. State"
Results 2421 - 2440
of 6,183
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Sep 2016, 6:50 am
He remains active in Cuba and tolerated by the state ad PPC. [read post]
6 Sep 2016, 6:37 am
Ward, para 4 One of the very few cases, and only labour case, in which the dual remedy was awarded was British Columbia Teachers’ Federation v. [read post]
5 Sep 2016, 7:43 am
¶ 13; see also State v. [read post]
3 Sep 2016, 8:14 am
Foto: Recinto de Río Piedras de la UPR (Facebook) Descarga el documento: Conlan V. [read post]
2 Sep 2016, 8:11 am
That finding, and its documentary expression, creates a presumption which can only be set aside for the most compelling reasons and is thus to be given the greatest weight by national courts (para 61). [read post]
2 Sep 2016, 6:35 am
(People v. [read post]
2 Sep 2016, 5:25 am
” Anderson v. [read post]
1 Sep 2016, 8:17 am
Sch 5, para 7 of the 2004 Act stipulated that the question of state retirement pension eligibility was to be determined as if the person’s acquired gender had always been their gender. [read post]
30 Aug 2016, 11:18 am
Johnson v. [read post]
25 Aug 2016, 12:20 pm
Sharif, 2014 IL App (1st) 133008, ¶ 25. [read post]
25 Aug 2016, 4:03 am
Also of interest in this case is the court’s reference to Lord Sumption’s judgment in Zakrzewski v District Court in Torun, Poland [2013] UKSC 2, which stated that “as a general rule the court of the executing state is bound to take the statements and information in the warrant at face value. [read post]
24 Aug 2016, 3:57 am
The recent CJEU judgment in VKI v Amazon (C-191/15) concerns jurisdiction both in the context of conflict of laws (applicable consumer laws) and the Data Protection Directive. [read post]
23 Aug 2016, 1:20 am
State immunity The Court of Appeal held that the arguments made by the UK “lacked any foundation in law” [para. 49]. [read post]
22 Aug 2016, 2:34 pm
And the ‘ordinary person’ is healthy and robust – para 71 of Hotak. [read post]
18 Aug 2016, 8:22 am
(See Rominger v. [read post]
16 Aug 2016, 8:18 am
What kind of jurisdiction does Article 8(3) of the InfoSoc Directive, as implemented into the laws of Member States, confer upon national courts? [read post]
15 Aug 2016, 2:33 pm
NISPOM ¶ 2-109. [read post]
15 Aug 2016, 2:11 pm
NISPOM ¶ 2-109. [read post]
15 Aug 2016, 10:51 am
[¶…. [read post]
15 Aug 2016, 8:43 am
Leonati, [1996] 3 SCR 458, at paras. [read post]
