Search for: "Queen v. Queen"
Results 2421 - 2440
of 4,039
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Aug 2009, 6:51 am
Progressive commenced this special proceeding to stay that arbitration, and Supreme Queens denied Progressive's petition. [read post]
20 May 2015, 3:20 pm
September 16, 2008. [54 A.D.3d 884] Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Hanophy, J.), rendered April 4, 2000, convicting him of murder in the first degree (three counts), and aggravated criminal contempt, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence. [read post]
1 Jun 2011, 1:44 am
The Queen (New Zealand) [2007] UKPC 33 (10 May 2007). [read post]
30 Mar 2011, 12:15 am
An application for a statement in open court could be made in both the Queen’s Bench and the Chancery Divisions. [read post]
27 Mar 2016, 4:02 pm
There was one privacy trial, Axon v Ministry of Defence, tried by Nicol J (judgment is awaited), one breach of confidence trial (Burrell v Clifford [2016] EWHC 294 (Ch)) and one privacy injunction (PJS v News Group Newspapers). [read post]
29 Mar 2011, 2:47 am
The Court is unlikely to decide differently if the King or Queen is not 'only' the head of State but also - technically - the source of all public authority (which the King of Spain is not: Article 1 (2) of the Constitution). [read post]
22 Oct 2013, 11:01 am
Co. v New York Univ. [read post]
16 Sep 2010, 5:30 pm
Cabinet Office v IC EA/2010/0031. [read post]
19 Jan 2009, 3:11 am
The Queens County trial jury awarded her $15,000,000 for her pain and suffering. [read post]
4 Apr 2012, 11:55 am
In Vartelas v. [read post]
19 Sep 2021, 8:20 pm
The Supreme Court of Canada stated in R. v. [read post]
21 Nov 2011, 7:46 am
Instead the Court chose to have that issue first resolved by the Queen’s Bench division. [read post]
16 Jul 2011, 11:33 am
In 2003, Justice Rouleau of the Superior Court essentially recognized the British throne and the Queen as a foreign institution governed by foreign rules inherited by our constitution (O’Donohue v. [read post]
21 Nov 2011, 7:28 am
Instead the Court chose to have that issue first resolved by the Queen’s Bench division. [read post]
2 Sep 2020, 5:15 am
In layman’s terms, pseudolaw is pure nonsense.AVI v. [read post]
19 Apr 2015, 1:56 pm
Delli Venneri v. [read post]
27 Feb 2019, 7:52 am
Ruston v. [read post]
13 Dec 2024, 6:48 am
See Uieky v. [read post]
3 Aug 2022, 4:32 am
Judgment was reserved but it has now been given: Guardian News and Media v The Executor of HRH The Prince Philip, Duke of Edinburgh [2022] EWCA Civ 1081. [read post]
