Search for: "S S V STATE OF MICHIGAN" Results 2421 - 2440 of 6,429
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Oct 2011, 9:49 am by Bill Raftery
While Ohio’s current 70 is the most typical age, several states use 75: Kansas, Missouri (municipal court judges), Oregon, Texas (Appellate + District), Utah, and Washington. [read post]
5 Dec 2020, 1:01 pm by McManus & Amadeo PLLC
To learn more about the Batson Challenge, we spoke to several of the top lawyers in the State of Michigan. [read post]
22 Feb 2013, 2:01 pm by Bexis
  It’s another example of how the Medicare as Secondary Payer (“MSP”) statute is changing the law in unexpected ways.We first got wind of this when the decision, Michigan Spine & Brain Surgeons, PLLC, , v. [read post]
25 Aug 2006, 8:53 am
The Michigan court of appeals ruled in Birry v Birry, Docket No. 256627 (Aug 24, 2006) on a number of issues that are of interest to family practitioners:1). [read post]
13 Sep 2009, 7:31 am by Timothy P. Flynn, Esq.
A recent Michigan Court of Appeals decision highlights the powers family court judges have in enforcing their orders.In Powers v Powers, the Wayne County Family Court jailed a Massachusetts woman for her refusal to abide by a series of parenting orders. [read post]
8 Aug 2019, 12:47 pm by Jason Shinn
Here’s a link to the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals August 6, 2019, decision (Texas v EEOC). [read post]
19 Dec 2019, 2:00 am by Kevin Kaufman
Kansas Rolling FAGI FTI Kentucky 12/31/18 FAGI FTI Louisiana Rolling FAGI Federal gross receipts (Line 1a) Maine 12/31/18 FAGI FTI Maryland Rolling FAGI FTI Massachusetts Rolling (CIT); 1/1/05 (PIT) State calculation Federal gross income Michigan Rolling FAGI FTI Minnesota 12/31/18 FAGI FTI Mississippi Selective State calculation FTI before NOLs and special deds. [read post]
29 Jun 2009, 7:44 am
Michigan Chamber of Commerce, and a part of McConnell v. [read post]
28 Nov 2012, 12:50 pm by WIMS
(discussing the Executive's unique role 'in the most critical emergencies of the state'). [read post]
10 Jan 2013, 11:59 am by Katherine McCoy
In the recent policy announcement, EPA stated that, due to Summit, the agency “may no longer consider interrelatedness in determining adjacency when making source determination decisions in its title V or NSR permitting decisions in areas under the jurisdiction of the 6th Circuit; i.e., Michigan, Ohio, Tennessee and Kentucky. [read post]