Search for: "State of New Jersey v. United States" Results 2421 - 2440 of 3,229
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 May 2011, 10:12 am by Michael Tan, Immigrants' Rights Project
In a sense, this should be old news: nearly thirty years ago, the Supreme Court in Plyler v. [read post]
10 Nov 2007, 8:06 am
Patrick, Director of Marketing MENTOR ABI Group - New Jersey Rehabilitative and Support Services for Persons with Acquired Brain Injury 505 S. [read post]
4 May 2020, 6:30 am by Sandy Levinson
  Jackson, in his famous Veto of the bill renewing the charter of the Bank of the United States declared first that “Mere precedent is a dangerous source of authority…. [read post]
22 Apr 2021, 5:55 am by Kevin Kaufman
States using a flat-dollar surcharge may levy a one-time surcharge, such as in Massachusetts, or may charge a flat amount per-day, as Hawaii, New Jersey, and West Virginia do. [read post]
15 Apr 2010, 10:40 am by Jay Willis
United States, in which he criticized the Department of Justice for failing to recommend that prisoners such as Dillon be pardoned. [read post]
8 Jul 2010, 2:42 pm by Moderator
The tax loss to the U.S., the lawyer said, was about $60,000.The case is United States of America v. [read post]
16 Dec 2009, 11:53 am
Since then, state courts in the United States have differed in their interpretations regarding the extent of these rights and the purpose for which protection is appropriate. [read post]
8 Nov 2009, 7:13 am
States with known local ordinances include California, Florida, Georgia, Iowa, New Jersey, New York, Texas, Virginia, and Washington. [read post]
20 Apr 2010, 6:04 am by Russell Jackson
Indeed, the court dismissed the claim under New Jersey's RICO statute because plaintiffs failed to allege fraud with particularity. [read post]
12 Sep 2013, 4:17 pm by Stephen Bilkis
Article 6 of the Civil Rights Law provides a formal procedure for changing a name, which provides the advantages of being speedy, definite and a matter of record as was done in Smith v United States. [read post]