Search for: "State v. Harris" Results 2421 - 2440 of 5,750
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Mar 2012, 10:19 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
Harris Corp., 156 F.3d 1182, 1187 (Fed. [read post]
3 Aug 2016, 7:17 am by Brian Cordery
Floyd LJ noted that he was reminded of a citation from an old case, Savage v Harris and Sons (1896) 13 RPC 364, which stated that “cases, so far as regards the law, are most useful, but when they are applied to particular facts, they, as a rule, are of little service. [read post]
28 Jul 2020, 5:00 am by Josh Blackman
(Then-Judge Harry Blackmun wrote the panel decision for the Eighth Circuit.) [read post]
23 Mar 2018, 7:07 am by Ezra Rosser
Meyer 4(2), pp. 91–112 Reconstructing the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program to More Effectively Alleviate Food Insecurity in the United States Craig Gundersen, Brent Kreider, John V. [read post]
3 May 2016, 5:08 am by Robert Kreisman
Supreme Court cast doubt on the fees in another Illinois case, Harris v. [read post]
23 Feb 2024, 2:38 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Moreover, the claims were not barred by the statute of limitations, which was tolled by both executive order (9 NYCRR 8.202.8), as extended, and the continuous representation doctrine (Murphy v Harris, 210 AD3d 410, 411 [1st Dept 2022]). [read post]
2 Jul 2015, 10:44 am by Lyle Denniston
On Tuesday, the Court accepted an appeal in Harris v. [read post]
15 Jan 2014, 4:10 pm
On the contrary, Mr Carr QC stated that issue estoppel and abuse of process are “all about justice” and noted the courts’ attempts to restrict the scope of strict action estoppel in cases such as Arnold v National Westminster Bank plc [1991] 2 AC 93 precisely because it can lead to injustice. [read post]
6 Nov 2013, 4:37 pm
 Simon Harris agreed, pointing his speech in the same direction. [read post]
30 Jan 2013, 5:53 am by JB
But not all reforms are made impossible; moreover, the most effective way to change individual constitutional doctrines is not Article V amendment. [read post]
14 Jul 2014, 5:56 am
  * No More (Trade Mark) Trouble With Harry (Winston) Marie-Andrée recounts the melting tale of the Winston family, where Harry built up a worldwide famous jewellery company in 1932 which now tries to prevent his son Bruce from registering his own name and surname as a trade mark for jewellery with the United States Patent and Trademark Office. [read post]