Search for: "State v. Holderness"
Results 2421 - 2440
of 7,272
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Feb 2022, 1:06 am
Zigann's 2018 Qualcomm v. [read post]
28 Nov 2022, 8:26 am
A common one is the absence of knowledge of the wrongdoing, as demonstrated in the case of L’Oréal SA v eBay International AG, where the High Court stated that eBay “did not know that such infringements had occurred and were likely to continue to occur” and this (amongst other factors) were not enough to make eBay liable as joint tortfeasors. [read post]
1 Aug 2013, 10:43 am
Scola, who also presides over the two-way Motorola Mobility v. [read post]
1 Aug 2018, 6:31 am
T.A.B. v. [read post]
2 Nov 2016, 11:00 am
Related Cases: United States v. [read post]
11 Apr 2012, 3:42 pm
Holder (Native American Church, marijuana)County of Charles Mix v. [read post]
2 Jan 2022, 8:17 am
., colour marks and 3D marks) (MHCS v EUIPO | Case T-274/20 and Guerlain v EUIPO | Case T-488/20), the risks of using a mark in a manner other than that registered (Fashioneast Sàrl v EUIPO | Case T-297/20) and taking unfair advantage of the reputation of a well-known mark (Asolo Ltd. v EUIPO | Case T-509/19) and the importance of presenting valid arguments for the existence of a link between the marks - even in the case of marks with an exceptional… [read post]
2 May 2019, 12:31 pm
("Thus, we join our sister courts in holding that account stated, and not a suit on a sworn account, is a proper cause of action for a credit card collection suit because no title to personal property or services passes from the bank to the credit card holder. [read post]
25 Jan 2018, 9:12 am
A recent case out of the Ninth Circuit, Oracle USA, Inc. v. [read post]
27 Jul 2007, 5:56 am
Garcia v. [read post]
18 Sep 2015, 10:11 am
In a newly issued opinion from the Massachusetts Land Court, Nutting v. [read post]
9 Oct 2008, 6:14 pm
See Wyeth v. [read post]
25 Jan 2010, 9:17 am
Of relevance to a recent trade secret case, captioned Bimbo Bakeries USA, Inc. v. [read post]
19 Dec 2009, 1:04 pm
In reaching this conclusion, the trial court relied on what it characterized as the "procedures" mandated by the Supreme Court in State v. [read post]
4 Jun 2011, 5:38 am
LUSTIG v. [read post]
14 Jul 2020, 3:05 pm
The parties in Harvard v. [read post]
21 Jun 2010, 1:08 pm
In Matulich v. [read post]
5 Oct 2020, 10:50 am
In a closely-watched cryptocurrency case, on September 30, the Southern District of New York ruled in favor of the SEC in SEC v. [read post]
11 Mar 2013, 8:12 am
More than a week after oral argument in Shelby County v. [read post]
18 Feb 2011, 6:30 pm
The commentary to this rule states that “[a]ny intentional disclosure by the holder of the privilege defeats this purpose and eliminates the necessity for the privilege in that instance. [read post]
