Search for: "Thomas v. State" Results 2421 - 2440 of 15,500
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Mar 2009, 12:56 pm
Supreme Court ruling on Vaden V. [read post]
19 Dec 2022, 4:00 am by Eric Segall
 By Eric SegallThis was a no good, terrible, very bad year at the Supreme Court of the United States. [read post]
25 Apr 2013, 10:12 am by Kirk Jenkins
But the anomaly comes from the Fourth District, which centers on the state capital of Springfield. [read post]
17 Apr 2007, 3:56 pm
Answer:          Yes, According to the United States Supreme Court in Watters, Commissioner v. [read post]
22 Oct 2010, 8:10 am by The Docket Navigator
The United States filed an amicus brief on Wednesday (October 20th), supporting the petition of false marking defendant, BP Lubricants, to obtain a writ of mandamus compelling dismissal of the suit filed by Thomas Simonian in the North District of Illinois. [read post]
5 Dec 2016, 2:30 am by Blog Editorial
He discusses the application of De Keyser principles and the controls imposed by Parliament on prerogative powers to ratify international treaties. 13.05: The hearing has adjourned for lunch and is expected to resume at 14:00. 12.58:  The next case referred to is R v Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs ex parte Rees-Mogg: James Eadie QC submits that the availability of the prerogative in relation to EU law depends on… [read post]
26 Apr 2016, 8:31 am by Yishai Schwartz
Doctrinally, Bank Markazi’s argument was based on a 19th Century precedent, United States v. [read post]
27 Sep 2021, 6:05 am by Howard Friedman
Mariner, Shifting Standards of Judicial Review during the Coronavirus Pandemic in the United States, (22 (6) German Law Journal 1039-1059 (2021).Thomas McMahon, The Great Commission, Papal Bulls and the Doctrine of Discovery: from the 4th Century to Current Law, (August 26, 2021).Josh Blackman, The Irrepressible Myth of Jacobson v. [read post]
19 Apr 2016, 6:30 am by Dan Ernst
In The Great Dissent (Henry Holt and Co. 2013), Thomas Healy explores Oliver Wendell Holmes’s dissent in Abrams v. [read post]